My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8210
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:32:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8210
Author
Dodge, D. P. and C. C. Mack.
Title
20
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Direct Control of Fauna
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
it <br />~e <br />i- <br />:s <br />~e <br />~- <br />d <br />d <br />~- <br />d <br />h <br />y <br />:r <br />e <br />i- <br />Direct Control of Fauna <br />reproducing native fish populations. Hatchery <br />fish are a means to achieve this kind of goal, but <br />ark not by themselves the raison d'etre for fish <br />management. Obviously we aze advocating re- <br />habilitation over mitigation as the first choice for <br />managers of riverine fisheries. However, there <br />will be many situations where mitigation using <br />hatchery fish is the only means available for river <br />management, e.g. where spawning habitat is <br />permanently lost or water quality changes prevent <br />self-sustained populations. The demand for high- <br />quality, inexpensive and readily available protein <br />may eliminate most if not all options except <br />the use of hatchery fish for aput-grow-and-take <br />fisheries management system. In the Orient, and <br />in' many European and African river systems, fish <br />communities necessary for human survival would <br />fail without the support of stocking. <br />Our examples focus on multi-agency experi- <br />ences derived from nearly 150 yeazs of managing <br />fish communities and their fisheries in the <br />Laurentian Great Lakes Region and other parts of <br />North America. On the one hand, this chapter <br />may not serve managers from Europe and Asia <br />who are working with rivers with longer manage- <br />ment experiences and already altered fish com- <br />munities. However, we feel the North American <br />experience is relevant for river managers in de- <br />veloping countries facing major demands for <br />increased fish extraction from severely-stressed <br />native fish communities, and who are trying to <br />develop a place and purpose for fish culture to <br />maintain some form of sustainability. North <br />Americans made horrendous decisions in the <br />mid-1800s that continue to this day to thwart <br />sustainability of fish communities in the Great <br />lakes ~e.g. introduction of the smelt, Osmerus <br />mordax~. These lessons, and the 1990's approach <br />to managing the Great Lakes ecosystem with <br />hatcheries as a major component, can help river <br />managers throughout the world. <br />For the purposes of this chapter, we have con- <br />fined our discussion to the intentional release of <br />chosen species. There is no doubt that similar <br />and often more disastrous effects can be traced to <br />introductions of new species that have escaped <br />confinement or that were accidentally introduced <br />by an unsuspected vector. One hundred years of <br />rainbow trout ~Oncorynchus mykiss~ culture and <br />387 <br />stocking worldwide have created naturalized, <br />often self-sustaining, populations which have <br />already caused most of their potential effects. <br />However, rainbow trout escapes from intensive <br />pond culture (e.g. in southern England) threaten <br />native brown trout (Salmo trutta~. Similarly, the <br />introduction of ruffe (Gymnocephalus cemus) <br />into Lake Superior from ballast water taken at a <br />European port carries the potential for an eco- <br />logical disaster for native Great Lakes percid <br />communities ~e.g. Stizostedian vitreum, Percn <br />flavescens~. <br />All this points up the importance of planning, <br />of understanding the needs of the fish being cul- <br />tured (or being considered for culture and intro- <br />duction) and of assessing the potential effects on <br />endemic fish communities from the stocked fish <br />before one puts great reliance on a fish culture <br />system to sustain a fishery. <br />This chapter is divided into sections that ex- <br />amine first the basic principles of fish culture <br />and the product desired; secondly, the factors <br />that influence the survival and growth of the fish; <br />and finally the role of regulations. <br />20.2 HATCHERIES AND <br />FISH STOCKING <br />History of stocking <br />The art and science of fish culture are ancient <br />pursuits. The Chinese cultured carp (Cyprinus <br />carpio~ and goldfish (C. crassus~ for food and <br />ornamentation as early as 4000 s.P. ~MacCrimmon <br />1968; Balon 1974. Although little evidence is <br />available showing that these and other species <br />were purposely introduced into 'wild' environ- <br />ments, there is no doubt that ponds and raceways <br />failed as frequently then as they have in modern <br />times so that cultured fish were released to new <br />environments to start new populations. <br />Despite a common misconception, trout and <br />salmon culture is a relatively young industry. <br />In the mid-1700s, Stephen Jacobi successfully <br />stripped and fertilized trout eggs and noted the <br />effects of light and temperature on the developing <br />embryos. Although his successes in Germany <br />were well publicized, a Frenchman, Joseph Remy, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.