Laserfiche WebLink
<br />274 <br /> <br />C.S. CHARBONNEAU ET AL. <br /> <br />Tahle 6. Percentages of mortality and SDS (in parentheses) of mosquilo and chironomid larvae used in the static acute toxicity tests <br /> <br /> 1110 Mortality al various trealment levels <br />Dale Species Pond Control RAR" 2 x RARb 5 x RAR< <br />7/26/89 Micropseclro and Tonylorsus Mpd 27 (6) 87 (6) 100 (0) 100 (0) <br /> Psorosphero 0(0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) <br />5/01/90 Chironomus, Dicrolendipes, <br /> and Porolonylorsus LBP< 40 (10) 50 (17) 93 (12) <br />5/08/90 Dicrolendipes LBP 27 (15) 27 (12) 23 (6) <br />5/19/90 Parolendipes MP 0(0) 17 (21) 57 (21) <br />6/08/90 Micropseclro. Tonylorsus, <br /> and Porolendipes MP 7 (6) 3 (6) 43 (15) <br /> Culex 0(0) 87 (15) 100 (0) <br /> <br />TeSI no. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br /> <br />"Recommended application rate. <br />bTwo times the recommended application rate. <br /><Five times the recommended application rate. <br />dMinnow Pond, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. <br /><Little Bass Pond, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. <br />rTreatment level not used in the test. <br /> <br />pendent of the two water sources (Fig. 6). Toxicity of <br />Vectobac-G was similar in water from a wetland (presumably <br />with more organic and inorganic matter) and in well water. <br />Addition of food did not change the efficacy of Vectobac- <br />G to C. riparius at the tested concentration (Fig. 7). <br />The effect of Vectobac-G at 0.1 ppm or chironomid lar- <br />vae was independent of the percentage of organic matter con- <br />tent in the tested sediment (Fig. 8). <br />Fourth-instar larvae were less sensitive than second- and <br />third-instar C. riparius at 0.0005 and 0.001 ppm (Fig. 9). <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Range tests conducted in the laboratory indicated chiron- <br />omid larvae were susceptible to Vectobac-G at levels substan- <br />tially lower than those recommended for field application. <br />However, all four field experiments indicated that Vectobac- <br />G did not reduce abundances of the benthic community un- <br />der conditions found at the Refuge, where it was applied at <br />the operational level, or even at five times the operational <br />level. The high power of enclosure test'l suggests high prob- <br />ability of detecting error; therefore, if an effect of the pesti- <br /> <br />cide occurred, it should have been detected. The emergence <br />data from enclosure test I also indicated no effect of the in- <br />vertebrate community after application of Vectobac-G. Al- <br />though enclosure tests 2, 3, and 4 had lower power, none of <br />the post-treatment levels of benthic invertebrates were notice- <br />ably lower than post-treatment controls. Complete elimina- <br />tion of mosquito larvae from the verification tests confirmed <br />that applications of Vectobac-G were sufficient to control <br />mosquito larvae as the product label described. <br />Other formulations of Bti have impacted chironomid pop- <br />ulations in natural habitats. In a review, the World Health <br />Organization [58] reported species of chironomids were af- <br />fected by locally produced cultures of Bti in flooded ditches <br />in West Germany and that there was a 76070 reduction of C. <br />fulvipilus in California after an aerial application of 0.05 <br />kg/L. A wettable powder formulation of Bti was tested <br />throughout the Kern Mosquito Abatement District, Bakers- <br />field, California, resulting in reductions of chironomid lar- <br />vae significantly higher than all other nontarget groups but <br />lower than those of mosquito larvae (22). When a wettable <br />powder formulation of Btiwas applied to experimental ponds, <br /> <br /> Table 7. Results of range-finding tests I to 4 (10 organisms per ,treatment) conducted with sediment <br /> OJo Mortality at various Vectobac-G~ <br /> concentrations (ppm) <br />Range EC50" LCLb UCU Statistical <br />test Sediment 10 0.1 0.01 0.001 Control (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) test <br />I Control 100 100 90 60 50 0 0.002 0.00002 0.008 Probit <br />2 Control 100 100 70 20 0 10 0.04 0.02 0.11 Probit <br />3 LBpd 100 90 30 0 10 0 0.20 0.08 0.51 Probit <br />4 BBP< 100 100 40 0 0 0 -0.13 0.01 1.0 Interpolation and binomial <br /> <br />.Concentration to which 50'10 of the chironomid larvae showed an effect after 48 h. <br />bLower 95070 confidence limit. <br /><Upper 95070 confidence limit. <br />dLittle Bass Pond, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. <br /><Big Bass Pond, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. <br />