Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Effect~ of Bli on invertebrales <br /> <br />273 <br /> <br />Table 3. Bemhic invertebrales (no.lsample) collected in core samples (N = 10) during enclosure test 2, before and 48 h after an application <br />of Vectobac-G'" al .he RAR (5.6 kg/ha) and 5 x RAR (28.1 kg/hal, Lillie Bass Pond, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge <br /> <br />Mean" (and so) number of invertebrates per sample <br /> <br /> Pretreatmem b POSI-lTeatmem' <br />Com ro) RARd 5 x RAR ConlTol RAR 5 x RAR <br />0.7 (0.9) 2.2 (3.8) 1.5 (2.3) 1.4 (2.5) 2.8 (5.2) 1.2 (2.1) <br />14.3 (18.8) 11.3 (20.0) 10.4 (15.4) 6.7 (10.9) 5.2 (7.5) 10.7(12.0) <br />46.1 (30.2) 57.3 (25.8) 51.4 (38.2) 29.9 (18.9) 31.8 (26.3) 21.2 (15.6) <br /> 3.0 (6.0) 100.0 (0.0) 100.0 (0.0) <br /> <br />Invertebrate <br />group <br /> <br />Amphipoda <br />Oligochaeta <br />Chironomidae <br />Aedes spp. (070 mortality)' <br /> <br />"Means are not significantly differem (P > 0.05) from each other when subject to ANOVA. <br />bApril23, 1990. <br />"April 26, 1990. <br />dRAR = recommended application rate. <br />"Verification test 2 conducted to confirm pesticide application. Results shown as percentages of mortality after 48 h. <br /> <br />ronomids in Refuge sediment compared to control sediment <br />(Table 7). <br />Mitigation tests. Efficacy of Vectobac-G at 6 ppm is de- <br />pendent on temperature (Fig. 3). At 270C, mortality was sig- <br />nificantly higher than at II or 190C, but mortality was similar <br />at II and 190C. <br />Results for water depth test I indicated that toxicity was <br />lower in the deeper water treatments (Fig. 4). Because two <br />different chambers were used for water depth test I (250-ml <br />beakers and I,OOO-ml graduated cylinders), we were unable <br />to determine whether depth affected mortality or if differ- <br />ences were due to the test chambers (there was more glass sur- <br />face area to which the Bli crystals could adhere in the <br />cylinder). A modified test chamber was designed to contain <br />both depths for water depth test 2. Again, the mortality <br />of larvae from the shallow depths was significantly greater <br />(Fig. 4). The effect of Vectobac-G was inversely related to <br />water depth. <br />At the RAR in depth test 3, the efficacy of Vectobac-G <br /> <br />Table 4. Benthic invertebrates (no.lsample) collected (N = 10) <br />during enclosure test 3. following application of Vectobac-G8. <br />Little Bass Pond, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. <br />May 9, 1990 <br /> <br />Mean (and SD) number of invertebrates <br />per sample <br /> <br />Invertebrate <br />group Control RAR" 5 X RARb <br />Amphipoda 0.5 (1.0) A < 0.4 (1.3) A 0.8 (0.9) A <br />Oligochaeta 14.3 (10.1) B 13.4 (15.9) BC 7.7 (8.0) C <br />Chironomidae 16.3 (I5.2) D 17.7 (12.2) D 19.4 (17.4) D <br />Aedes spp. <br />(070 mortality)d 0.0 (0.0) 97.0 (6.0) 100.0 (0.0) <br /> <br />"Recommended application rate: 5.6 kg/ha. <br />bFive times the recommended application rate: 28.1 kg/ha. <br /><Means in a row followed by the same letter are not significantly dif- <br />ferem (P> 0.05) from each other when subject to ANOVA. <br />dVerification test 3 conducted to confirm pesticide application. Re- <br />sults shown as percentages of mortality after 48 h. <br /> <br />to lield-collected chironomid (Micropsectra {Tony tarsus] and <br />Endochironomus spp.) larvae was not affected by water depth <br />(Fig. 4). However, at 5 x RAR the efficacy of Vectobac-G <br />to field-collected chironomid larvae was decreased by the <br />water depth. These three tests, conducted under different <br />conditions, indicated/hat efficacy of the pesticide to chiron- <br />omids is lower in deeper water. <br />Various percentages of macrophyte surface area coverage <br />were tested in macrophyte test I to determine if coverage in- <br />fluenced the efficacy of Vectobac-G. Toxicity of Vectobac- <br />Gat 5.1 ppm on C. riparius was dependent on the amount <br />of surface area covered by macrophytes (Fig. 5). In macro- <br />phyte test 2, washings from the macrophytes used in mac- <br />rophyte test I were used to determine if Bli crystals were <br />clinging to plant material. The mortality caused by Vectobac-G <br />residue on the plant material (from macrophyte test I) de- <br />pended on the amount of surface area covered by macro- <br />phytes (Fig. 5). <br />The effect of Vectobac-G on C. riparius larvae was inde- <br /> <br />Table 5. Benthic invertebrates (no.lsample) collected (N = 10) <br />following applications of Vectobac-G~, enclosure test 4, <br />Minnow Pond. Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, <br />May 21. 1990 <br /> <br />Mean" and (m) number of invertebrates <br />per sample <br /> <br />Invertebrate <br />group Control RARb 5 X RAR< <br />Gammarus spp. 76.2 (35.9) 95.0 (68.0) 73.6 (25.2) <br />Oligochaeta 132.0 (41.6) 125.6 (37.2) 121.3 (48.1) <br />Chironomidae 134.4 (93.0) 120.3 (65.5) 120.5 (122.2) <br />Culisela spp. <br />(070 mortality)d 0.0 (0.0) 97.0 (6.0) 100.0 (0.0) <br /> <br />"Means are not significantly different (P> O.OS) from each other <br />when subject to ANOVA. <br />bRecommended application rate: 5.6 kg/ha. <br /><Five times the recommended application rate: 28.1 kg/ha. <br />dVerification test 4 conducted to confirm pesticide application. Re- <br />sults shown as percentages of mortality after 48 h. <br />