Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />The predictabil ity of habitat area relative to flows may be useful in <br />managing habitat for the needs of endangered fish. If essential reaches of <br />the river are identified for specific needs of these fish, then their <br />habitat dynamics might be described relative to flows. Management schemes <br />might then be developed to provide ample habitat when needed. <br /> <br />Use of this approach is dependent upon a clearer understanding of the <br />habi ta t needs of the endangered fi shes and the essenti al reaches of ri ver <br />used for critical stages in their life history. This information might be <br />used to develop a more useful habitat cataloging system that defines habitat <br />based on the needs of the fish. Mapping and the subsequent development of <br />relationships between these habitats and flow may be useful in helping to <br />manage flows for endangered fish and for current water use needs. <br /> <br />This method, or a refinement, could be useful as a tool to help assess <br />and quantify the net change resulting from some controlled perturbations on <br />the Upper Colorado River System. Coupled with better understanding of the <br />flow - habitat - fish relationship, a useful tool could be developed for <br />resource managers to appreciate the consequences of their decisions. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />LITERATURE CITED <br /> <br />Archer, D. L. and H. M. Tyus. 1984. Colorado squawfish spawning study, <br />Yampa River. Final Report. U. S. Fish and Wildl ife Service, Colorado <br />River Fishery Project, Salt Lake City, Utah. 34 pp. <br /> <br />Archer, D., H. Tyus and R. Valdez. 1980. Field methodologies of the Fish <br />and Wildlife Service's Colorado River Fisheries Project. Trans. <br />Bonneville Chapter Amer. Fish. Soc. 13-36. <br /> <br />Beamsderfer, R. C. and J. L. Congl eton. 1981. Spawning behavior, habitat <br />selection, and early life history of northern squawfish with inferences <br />to Colorado squawfish, pp. 47-127. IN: W. H. Miller, D. Archer and <br />J. Valenti ne, Colorado Ri ver Fi shery lrroj ect Fi nal Report - Contracted <br />Studies. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Reclamation MOU <br />No. 9-06-40-L-I016. <br /> <br />Behnke, R. J. and D. E. Benson. 1983. Endangered and threatened fi shes of <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin. Coop. Extension Service, Colorado <br />State Univ., Fort Collins. Bulletin 503A. 34 pp. <br /> <br />Haynes, C. M., T. A. Lytle, E. J. Wick and R.T. Muth. 1984. Larval <br />Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius girard) in the upper Colorado <br />River basin, Colorado, 1979-1981. ~estern Naturalist 29(1):21-33. <br /> <br />Hynes, H. B. N. <br />Press. <br /> <br />1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto <br />555 pp. <br /> <br />Holden, P. B. <br />squawfish. <br /> <br />1977. Habitat requirements of juvenile Colorado River <br />U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-77/65. 71 pp. <br /> <br />Kaeding, L. R. and M. A. Zinmerman. 1982. Life history and population <br />ecology of the humpback chub in the Little Colorado and Colorado Rivers <br />of the Grand Canyon, Arizona. IN: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Colorado River Fishery Project, FTnal Report. Pt. 2. Salt Lake City, <br />pp. 280-320. <br /> <br />263 <br />