My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6007
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
6007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6007
Author
Carter, J. G., R. E. Valdez, R. J. Ryel and V. L. Lamarra
Title
Fisheries Habitat Dynamics in the Upper Colorado River
USFW Year
1985
USFW - Doc Type
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />These dynamics in total habitat are clearly shown to be a function of <br />discharge in Figure 11. From these analyses, it appears that potential fish <br />habitat was at a maximum during peak flows in late June. However, much of <br />the habi tat at that time consi sted of deep mi dchannel runs and rapi ds that <br />seem to force fish into a few marginally suited shoreline-associated <br />habitats such as flooded woodlands and large backwaters. These habitats are <br />considered marginal because of their instability during high flows and the <br />intense competition and predation brought about by the concentration of <br />fishes. At lower flows, the habitat becomes more diverse and moderate (less <br />turbulence and velocity), and enables fishes of different species and sizes <br />to occupy a greater variety of suitable microhabitats. That dramatic change <br />from a swollen, turbulent, swift-flowing river to a more confined, moderate- <br />flowing one occurs near Parachute at about 10,000 cfs. <br /> <br />Management Implications <br /> <br />The resul ts of thi s study are a step toward a better understanding of <br />habitat dynamics in the Colorado River. It was shown that the surface area <br />of several of the habitat types are predictable functions of flow within <br />this reach of river. Similar patterns are likely in similar reaches of the <br />Colorado River; however, the specific relationships between flow and habitat <br />area may differ somewhat due to small, localized differences in channel <br />morphology and land use practices. In reaches of the river where the <br />channel morphol09Y is qui te di fferent, a somewhat different set of <br />relationships may be expected. <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br /> <br />BODO <br /> <br />7000 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />.;- <br />1/1 !'QOO <br />o <br />o <br />52 <br />x <br />........ .4.000 <br />" <br />~ <br /><( <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />JULY <br /> <br />AUGUST <br /> <br />1983 <br /> <br />Figure 10. Habitat area as a <br />function of time between <br />6 June and 2 September 1983 <br />for the Colorado River study <br />area near Parachute, Colorado. <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />7000 <br /> <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />.;- <br />.. 5000 <br />o <br />o <br />52 <br />x <br />........ ..ODD <br />" <br />~ <br /><( <br /> <br />3000 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />tOaD <br /> <br />6000 <br /> <br />12000 18000 24000 30000 <br />Discharge (cIs) <br /> <br />Figure 11. Habitat area as a <br />function of discharge between <br />3 March and 2 September 1983 <br />for the Colorado River study <br />area near Parachute, Colorado. <br /> <br />262 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.