My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7923
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7923
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7923
Author
Carter, J. G. and V. A. Lamarra.
Title
An Ecosystem Approach To Environmental Management, Chapter 17.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
261-287
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the particular environmental conditions present (such as <br />stream temperature, velocity, oxygen concentration, light <br />intensity, water hardness or alkalinity). It should also <br />be noted that within a specific stream reach, a habitat <br />type (pool or riffle) will also affect the distribution of <br />macroinvertebrates. Hynes (1970) has extensively <br />documented the truly unique or specialized <br />macroinvertebrate adaptations found in riffle or pool <br />systems. Distributional patterns, within stream systems <br />of the same size, in terms of occurrence and density, are <br />influenced by water movement and the nature of the surface <br />available for colonization (substrate particle size). It <br />has been previously discussed how velocity and turbulence <br />limit the ranges of particle size, and thus <br />macroinvertebrate distribution. Data as to the role of <br />the above factors on macroinvertebrate distributions and <br />abundances in the White River are being collected in the <br />ongoing 1981 environmental program. <br /> <br />Undoubtly, food is the ultimate determinant of <br />macroinvertebrate distribution and abundance in <br />non-perturbed running waters. Cummins (1973) has <br />described the type of community based on food habits. An <br />analysis of the White River macroinvertebrate data <br />indicates the presence of the following groups: <br /> <br />1. grazers and scrapers-herbivores <br />attached algae. <br /> <br />feeding <br /> <br />on <br /> <br />2. shredders-large particle feeding detritivores. <br /> <br />3. collectors-both suspension (filter) and deposit <br />(surface) fine particle feeding detritivores. <br /> <br />4. predators-carnivores <br /> <br />The role that the primary producers play in the <br />stream system is related to the previous discussion on <br />CPOM and FPOM. If the major primary producer is a <br />micro-algae, its biomass may be reduced by direct <br />predation (i.e., by macroinvertebrates, functionally <br />called scrapers) or be sluffed off into the FPOM pool. <br />However, if it is an aquatic hydrophyte, or a moss, it may <br />enter the food chain, almost exclusively during die off, <br />therefore following the same general CPOM pathway as <br />terrestrial inputs. <br /> <br />There are several important factors that must be <br />studied in the White River if natural fluctuations in the <br />primary producers are to be fully understood. Depth and <br /> <br />278 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.