My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7775
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7775
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7775
Author
Carlson, C. A. and R. T. Muth.
Title
Inland Fisheries Management in North America, Chapter 15
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Endangered Species Management.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ENDANGERED SPECIES <br /> <br />373 <br /> <br />special need for biological surveys to determine the status of rare fishes and gain <br />legal protection for those near extinction, particularly in Mexico and, to a lesser <br />extent, Canada. Williams et aI. (1989) stressed the need for long-term monitoring <br />programs to provide baseline data on the status of rare fishes and allow future <br />assessment of both fish populations and their habitats. Managers of rare fishes <br />must proceed cautiously, howev1er, because tbe field is relatively new and much <br />remains to be learned (Meffe 1986). We must, for example, avoid over-monitoring <br />populations of threatened or endangered fisbes~ it is possible to study some <br />species to extinction. Because of political and biological urgency regarding <br />recovery, aspects of basic biology (e.g., genetics, reproduction, growth, age <br />structure, sex ratio) have often been neglected in research on rare fishes. Many <br />suggestions of MIot (1989) and Soule and Kohm (1989) regarding research <br />directions for conservation biology should be applied to rare fishes; emphasis on <br />ecosystem fragmentation, biology of small systems, reproduction, reintroduction, <br />and effects of stress and disease is justified. Population dynamics and habitat <br />needs, with particular emphasis on early life stages, must be understood for <br />effective management. Single-sp'~cies approaches to recovery efforts must and <br />have begun to give way to considering endangered fishes as components of <br />complex ecosystems. Biologists must also recognize their obligations as informed <br />citizens to see that laws that protf~ct species or tbeir habitats are passed, modified <br />as necessary, and enforced. <br /> <br />15.5.1 Managing Fish and Habitat <br /> <br />Specific practices that can be applied to management of endangered fishes <br />include (I) maintaining and enhancing historic populations; (2) protecting, ex- <br />panding, or restoring habitat; (3) moving specimens to refuges; (4) rearing and <br />stocking in new or formerly occupied areas; (5) minimizing introductions and <br />undesirable effects of introduced nonnative organisms; and (6) controlling exploi- <br />tation. First, factors leading to species rarity must be identified and, if possible, <br />controlled. <br />We have listed maintaining and enhancing historic native populations first as a <br />reminder of their importance. This could involve some or all of the other <br />management practices considered in this section. One approach to avoiding <br />extinction. however, might be to simply leave some populations and their habitats <br />alone. Saving entire species from extinction is of paramount importance. <br />Habitat should be a primary consideration in recovery of rare fishes. Land <br />acquisition as accomplished in the Death Valley drainage is the most effective <br />means of protecting habitat for e:ndangered species. Other approaches involve <br />participation in pollution-control efforts. land-use planning, and legal actions to <br />prevent habitat destruction. Definition and development of optimal habitats is far <br />more effective in enhancing endangered fish populations than imposition of <br />restrictive regulations (Deacon et aI. 1979). Johnson and Rinne (1982) noted that <br />protection and enhancement of habitats is the almost universal goal of fish <br />recovery plans, but recovery teams have generally left implementation to the <br />discretion of land managers. They suggested that existing habitats be protected <br />through increased federal management, prioritizing protected habitats, and use of <br />ecosystem-based recovery teams. To make protection more efficient, only optimal <br /> <br />p...- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.