My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7775
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7775
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7775
Author
Carlson, C. A. and R. T. Muth.
Title
Inland Fisheries Management in North America, Chapter 15
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Endangered Species Management.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" :J72 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 15 <br /> <br />major threat has been extensive introduction to areas outside their native ranges <br />(Behnke and Zarn 1976); this has led to hybridization and resulted in loss of <br />genetically pure populations, increased competition for food and space, and <br />increased predation on young trout. Allendorf and Leary (1988) considered <br />introgression, dilution of native alleles, the most important effect of introductions <br />of nonnative western trout. Widespread introgression can lead to replacing the <br />diversity of taxa produced by evolution with a single taxon. Such homogenization <br />could result in loss of locally adapted populations and, Jess importantly, outbreed- <br />ing depression (hybrids with reduced fitness). Another factor blamed for the <br />decline of native western trouts is habitat destruction caused by water diversion <br />and removal, channelization, water pollution, and overgrazing of rangeland and <br />damage to streambanks by livestock. <br />Originally, the Apache trout and greenback, Lahontan, and Paiute cutthroat <br />trouts were federaIJy listed as endangered, but they were reclassified as threat- <br />ened to facilitate recovery and management efforts (Behnke and Zarn 1976). <br />Federal recovery plans have been approved for several native western trouts, and <br />management programs have been suc';::essful in rehabilitating certain populations. <br />Status and management of Lahontan and greenback cutthroat trouts were <br />considered in Gresswell (1988); in general, elimination of nonnative trout, <br />reintroduction of genetically pure native stocks, habitat protection and improve- <br />ment, and restricted harvest have been used to enhance populations of these <br />fishes. These actions conform to the steps in a native trout management program <br />outlined by Behnke and Zarn (1976): (1) collection of specimens from suspected <br />genetically pure populations, (2) identification of pure populations by taxonomic <br />study of collected specimens, (3) prot,ection and possible improvement of existing <br />habitat, (4) introduction of native trout into isolated waters devoid of nonnative <br />trouts, and (5) establishment of special-regulation fisheries where applicable. <br />Native western trouts are some of the most aesthetically pleasing fishes in <br />North America and have high sport value. Behnke and Zarn (1976) stated that <br />low-cost quality fisheries can be based on native trouts if they are properly <br />managed and publicized. Therefore, odds favor native western trouts if any of <br />North America's threatened or endangered fishes have a chance of being <br />recovered and delisted. Public awareness and support are needed if native <br />western trouts are to be saved. <br /> <br />15.5 MANAGEMENT FOR ENDANGERED FISHES <br /> <br />Fisheries biologists can use many approaches to alleviate threats to rare native <br />fishes. In general, they should strivle to maintain populations of threatened or <br />endangered fishes by recognizing tht:ir status and the importance of preserving <br />biological diversity, contributing to knowledge about them, applying management <br />strategies (and provisions of the ESA), or instructing others on the merits of such <br />actions. <br />When conservation of fishes is possible, Moyle and Cech (1988) recommended <br />the following steps: (1) inventory fishes; (2) monitor habitats, communities, and <br />species; (3) conduct research on best management of resource and nonresource <br />fishes; (4) plan regional management following natural, rather than political, <br />boundaries; and (5) manage fish communities and habitats as units. We see a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.