My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8105
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:34:21 AM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8105
Author
Haines, G. B., D. W. Beyers and T. Modde.
Title
Estimation of Winter Survival, Movement and Dispersal of Young Colorado Squawfish in the Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Recovery Program Project 36,
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SUBADULT HUMPBACK CHUB IN THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />279 <br /> <br />\' <br /> <br />8 10 12 14 16 18 20 <br />Discharge (cms x 1,000) <br /> <br />Figure 7. Change in depth, velocity and cover with discharge for each shoreline type. Data points are not shown to facilitate <br />visualization of trends. Be, bedrock; CB, cobble; OF, debris fan; SA, sand; TS, talus; and VG, vegetation <br /> <br />10 <br />8 <br />6 <br />4 <br />2 <br />o <br />0.60 <br />0.45 <br />0.30 <br />0.15 <br /> <br />0.0 <br />100 <br />80 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br /> <br />o 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Velocity (m/s) <br /> <br />- - -'"":::.- """----~ - - - - <br />~-: -~- <br /> <br />SHORELINE <br />- - VG <br />SA <br />CB <br />- - - DF <br />TA <br />- BE <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />The importance of cover as an attribute of habitat <br /> <br />Numerous studies have demonstrated the importance of cover as a habitat attribute (Fraser and Cerri, <br />1982; Fraser, 1983; Power et al., 1985; Schlosser, 1987). Cover may be important for several reasons. <br />First, fish may seek out cover to avoid light (Lewis, 1969; Cunjak, 1988). This possibility seems likely for <br />native fish of the Colorado River, which evolved under turbid conditions and have been noted as <br />negatively phototactic (Valdez et aI., 1992). Secondly, small fish may find it easier to avoid predation in <br />areas with greater cover (Fraser and Emmons, 1984; Mesick, 1988). The recent introduction of nonnative <br />salmonids, catfish and other piscivorous sport fish has added a substantial source of predation that did <br />not exist historically (Marsh and Douglas, 1994; Valdez and Ryel, 1995). Also, cover is frequently the <br />result of some laterally or vertically emergent object that obstructs flow, thereby providing refuge from <br />high current velocities (Fausch, 1984; McMahon and Hartman, 1989). <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> 4 I <br />0- Pre-dam <br />0 I <br />0 <br />0 <br />.... 3 J <br />x <br />Ul <br />E ( <br />~ 2 <br />CD <br />e> ,/ <br />I'll Post-dam <br />or=. <br />0 1 <br />Ul <br />is <br /> <br /> <br />20 40 60 80 100 <br /> <br />Percent lime less than <br />Figure 8. Flow duration curve of the Colorado River at Lee's Ferry gauge <br /> <br />@ 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. <br /> <br />Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 14: 267-284 (1998) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.