My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7104
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:30:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7104
Author
Green, B. and M. Butler.
Title
Analysis of Channel Maintenance and Flushing Flows in the Colorado River at the Palisade Habitat Site (Appendix B).
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Concerning the frequency of the flushing flow, the peak mean daily <br />flows have been evaluated for the 31 years that are modelled under <br />this study. The minimum flushing flow of 10,000 cfs was not met in <br />10 years, and was decreased by the Two Forks project in 3 years. <br />The Williams Fork project further reduced the peak flow in the same <br />3 years. The peak flows affected by the projects that were below <br />10,000 cfs are listed below. <br /> <br />Year <br />1961 <br />1976 <br />1981 <br /> <br />Baseline <br />8,177 <br />8,310 <br />4,522 <br /> <br />~o <br />Forks <br />8,145 <br />8,278 <br />4,490 <br /> <br />Williams <br />Fork <br />7,988 <br />8,124 <br />4,473 <br /> <br />The above peak flows are mean daily flows and the corresponding <br />instantaneous peak flow is typically 200 to 2,000 cfs higher. Thus <br />the use of mean daily values to analyze the impact on the flushing <br />flows of 10,000 cfs is conservative. Diversions from the projects <br />will alter the flooq frequency curve at palisades by increasing the <br />. ~A <br /> <br />recurrence interval for a given flow. Using the peak mean daily <br />flows for the 1952 to 1982 period of record and a log-Pearson type <br />III distribution, a 10,000 cfs flow has a recurrence interval of <br />1.65 years. The Two Forks project increases the recurrence <br />interval to 1.66 years and the Williams Fork project increases the <br />interval to 1.67 years. The increase in recurrence intervals <br />(longer average time petween flows of same magnitude) at Palisades <br />from the Two Forks and Williams Forks projects is not appreciable. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.