Laserfiche WebLink
<br />j <br />r <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Fig. 7. Analogy between shooting result and estimation. The center of the target represents the true population size y, and the <br />bias the distance between the center of the target and the center E(y) of the shot group. The mean distance between the shots <br />(dots) and the center of the shot group represents the sampling error SE(y). <br /> <br />confidence interval about the estimate 9. A 95 % <br />confidence interval has the meaning that the true <br />(but unknown) y is included in this interval in 95 <br />cases out of 100 if, hypothetically, the estimation <br />were repeated many times. The calculation of the <br />confidence interval is often based on the Standard <br />Error. <br />Finally a word about the measurement of the <br />spatial variation of a population. Anyone familiar <br />with fish sampling has observed that the density <br />of fish usually varies from site to site. Suppose <br />that the total area in which the population lives is <br />divided into a number of smaller units. The mean <br />density per unit, '1, is then the total population size <br />divided by the number of units. The (spatial) <br />variance V(y) ofy is the mean value of the squared <br />deviations (y - '1) over all units, and the Standard <br />Deviation SD(y) of y the square root of V(y). <br />SD(y) is a measurement of how much the popula- <br />tion size in the units differ, on the average, from <br />the population mean '1. Observe the similarities <br />and differences of SE(Y) and SD(y); the former <br />is a measurement of the precision of an estimate y, <br /> <br />and the latter is a measurement of the spatial <br />variation of the population. SD(y) and '1 are most <br />easily calculated using a calculator with pre- <br />programmed functions. <br /> <br />Precision requirements <br /> <br />In all studies the attempt is, of course, to obtain <br />as good a precision as possible. The problem is <br />that increased precision usually has to be paid for <br />in time, work and money. In addition, the preci- <br />sion requirement is intimately linked to the type of <br />question that is to be answered. <br />As an example, say we are interested in com- <br />paring the fish densities in two streams. Esti- <br />mation yields 9 I and 92' respectively. If both <br />estimates have poor precision, we may not be able <br />to tell if there is any real difference between the <br />true densities, unless the estimated difference is <br />very large. For some purposes, thus, a poor preci- <br />sion may make the study quite worthless. On the <br />other hand, if we are interested merely in dis- <br />