Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />, FISHERIES MANAGEMENT-PERSPECTIVE . <br /> <br />Large <br />T <br />I <br />I <br />- <br /> <br />High <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />- <br /> <br />CII <br />.... <br />'iij <br />c <br />o <br />".;j <br />I\J <br />-= <br />C. <br />o <br />Q. <br /> <br />.:z::: <br />III <br />';: <br /> <br />..................................................... <br /> <br />c <br />o <br />':;: <br />v <br />C <br />':;: <br />>< <br />w <br /> <br />Small <br /> <br />Low <br /> <br />Time <br /> <br />Figure 1. The general relationship between population size and <br />extinction risk illustrates the potential danger of fisheries manage- <br />ment policies that consider conservation aquaculture as a last resort <br />for recovering endangered populations. Such policies may dictate <br />implementation of conservation aquaculture when a population has <br />already entered an extinction vortex (shaded rectangle at right). This <br />condition may limit the success of any population recovery effort. <br />The dark vertical bar (far right) represents extinction. <br /> <br />habitat to support a restored population. A second <br />approach suggests that aquaculture is a necessary interim <br />measure to maintain the viability of endangered popula- <br />tions. Critics of this second approach suggest that risks <br />such as catastrophic loss due to culture facility failure or <br />fish loss resulting from disease outbreak may outweigh its <br />intended benefits. Rather that debating the strengths and <br />weaknesses of these two approaches, one should realize <br />that the success of each approach may be jeopardized if <br />either is implemented exclusively. With the exception of <br />overharvest, fish population crashes are rarely univariate <br />problems. Thus, univariate management solutions often <br />have failed to restore fish populations due to unresolved <br />underlying problems. Fisheries managers need to <br />acknowledge that several conservation measures can be <br />complementary, and should seek combined strategies to <br />immediately address conservation of gene pools while <br />reestablishing habitats to support restored populations. <br />An inflexible fisheries management policy that consid- <br />ers conservation aquaculture as a last resort for managing <br />endangered fish populations can seriously jeopardize the <br />potential for recovering wild fish populations and can <br />increase the probability of serious or irreversible genetic <br />bottlenecks. As population size decreases, so does its N" <br />Depending on population age class structure or particular <br />harvest regulations, N" may decline at a disproportionately <br />higher rate than total population size. In some cases slot <br />limits, designed to prohibit harvest of fish of a particular <br />size range, have been implemented to reduce the chances <br />of disproportionate reduction of effective population size. <br />If population size decreases in a relatively linear fashion <br />(e.g., due to recruitment failure and natural mortality), the <br />risks of reduced population viability and persistence may <br />increase exponentially as N,. declines (Figure 1). This phe- <br />nomenon is referred to as an extil/ctiol/ vortex (Cilpin ilnd <br />Soule 1(86). In this situiltion, risks tilke the form of reduced <br /> <br />30 . Fisheries <br /> <br />or lost within-population genetic variation manifested by <br />genetic drift and inbreeding in small populations. By <br />applying this concept across the geographic range of a <br />species with multiple populations, it becomes evident that <br />demographic bottlenecking also can reduce among-popu- <br />lation genetic diversity of the species as individual popu- <br />lations are lost or substantially reduced. Without timely <br />implementation of appropriate conservation aquaculture, <br />fish managers may unintentionally reduce the probability <br />of population recovery after allowing N" to fall to danger- <br />ously low levels. This is generally true regardless of the <br />recovery measures undertaken. <br />The recovery process for the Kootenai River population <br />of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) in Idaho, Mon- <br />tana, and British Columbia provides a good example of <br />fisheries management that simultaneously incorporates <br />conservation aquaculture and ecosystem restoration. In <br />response to general natural recruitment failure since the <br />mid-1960s, this aging and declining population was listed <br />as endangered in 1994 under the Endangered Species Act. <br />Rather than using a large-scale production hatchery to <br />supplement this population, a breeding strategy was devel- <br />oped to preserve the population's remaining genetic vari- <br />ability. This conservation aquaculture program provides a <br />systematic approach to preserving the Kootenai River <br />white sturgeon gene pool while management agencies <br />work to restore river habitat conducive to natural spawn- <br />ing, larval survival, and natural recruitment. Simultaneous <br />research to determine the ecological factors contributing to <br />natural recruitment failure has been ongoing since 1989. <br />This research has primarily focused on white sturgeon life <br />history and reproductive biology, river productivity, and <br />fish community dynamics issues, as well as on alterations <br />to the post-impoundment hydrograph, in an international- <br />ly coordinated attempt to reestablish natural recruitment. <br />In conclusion, it is absolutely critical to understand that <br />persistence and viability of endangered fish populations <br />are profoundly affected by the size and structure of the <br />population, its genetic variability, and its adaptive poten- <br />tial. Conservation aquaculture is by no means proposed as <br />a panacea for recovering endangered fish populations. <br />However, in certain situations it may be the only viable, <br />immediate solution for maintaining adequate Ne and pre- <br />serving within-population genetic diversity, two require- <br />ments for long-term population persistence. Timely imple- <br />mentation of appropriately designed conservation <br />aquaculture programs can, in some cases, provide a suc- <br />cessful alternative to demographic and genetic bottleneck- <br />ing, inbreeding depression, and loss of unique and impor- <br />tant locally adapted genes. Such programs ultimately may <br />reduce the immediate threat of extinction for endangered <br />fish populations. Conversely, aquaculture for any purpose, <br />especially with small threatened and endangered popula- <br />tions, is not risk-free. Therefore, the need for objective, <br />case-by-case evaluation of conservation aquaculture is crit- <br />ical (Anders 19(7). I suggest that a rationill approach to <br />assessing the role of conservation ilquaculture is to under- <br />stand that it is one component, with population-specific <br /> <br />Vol. 23, No. 11 <br /> <br />-- <br />