Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FIGURE 4.-Somatic (total length, TL) and otolith (J..Lm) growth patterns of Colorado squawfish larvae in (A) <br />constant and (B) fluctuating temperature conditions centered on 220([:. Fish were II d old at the start of the experiment <br />(day 0). Treated fish were fed for 6 d, starved for 6 d (interval between arrows), fed for 6 d, and preserved, Error <br />bars about means are :':2 SE (N = 8). . <br /> <br />lith diameter to age also differed between fast- and <br />slow-growing fish. Otolith growth was more con- <br />servative than somatic growth; in regressions of <br />squared total length (Figure 2) or squared lapillus <br />diameter (Figure 3) versus age, slope differences <br /> <br />I <br />betwee~ fast- and slow-growing larvae were con- <br />siderably less for otoliths than for body length. <br />Because growth rate effects are typically mani- <br />fested ~s differences in slopes of otolith length- <br />fish leJgth regressions between treatments (Cam- <br />I <br />