Laserfiche WebLink
<br />112 <br /> <br />BESTGEN AND BUNDY <br /> <br />temperature was constant at 220C or fluctuated <br />around that level (Figure 4). However, otolith <br />growth was maintained through starvation in both <br />temperature treatments. Before starvation, somatic <br />growth was slightly faster with fluctuating tem- <br />perature (mean, 2.3 mm TL) than with constant <br />temperature (1.9 mm), but it was similar in the 6- <br />d period after feeding was resumed (means = 1.5 <br />mm versus 1.4 mm). Otolith increments were of <br />relatively high contrast before, during, and after <br />the starvation period. <br />In experiment 3, food was withheld from 6-d- <br />old fish for 5, 10, 15, or 17.5 d to determine effects <br />of the starvation period on otolith and fish growth. <br />During the first 5 d of starvation (to age 11 d), <br />otolith and somatic growth rates of larvae in all <br />treatments remained similar to those of continu- <br />ously fed control fish (Figure 5). Fish in the 5-d <br />starvation treatment showed a delayed effect of <br />starvation in that their body lengths and lapillus <br />diameters were smaller than control values at day <br />16. In the 10-, 15-, and 17.5-d treatments, somatic <br />growth was largely arrested by the time fish were <br />11 d old, but otoliths continued to grow in fish up <br />to day 21. After feeding resumed, somatic growth <br />of fish in the 10-, 15-, and 17.5-day treatments <br />increased immediately, but it did not reach the <br />control rate until fish had fed for 2.5-5 d. Con- <br />versely, otoliths grew only slowly or not at all for <br />the first 2.5-5 d of resumed feeding; after 5 d, <br />otolith growth was nearly that of controls. <br />Width and contrast of otolith growth increments <br />was not reduced during the first 5-d starvation pe- <br />riod. However, the space on the otolith correspond- <br />ing to starvation periods longer than 5 d was gen- <br />erally opaque throughout and daily increments <br />were more difficult to distinguish. Daily incre- <br />ments deposited after fish resumed feeding were <br />dark and of high contrast, but that quality was <br />apparent only 1-2 d after the starvation period. <br />In the absence of food, a temperature difference <br />of 70C had little effect on otolith growth (exper- <br />iment 4). After 7 d of starvation, lapillus diameters <br />of 21-d-old larvae averaged 148 fLm (SE, 5.3) for <br />the 180C treatment and 152 (3.5) fLm for the 250C <br />treatment. When fish were fed continuously <br />through day 21, lapillus diameters were 173 (5.3) <br />fLm at l80C and 206 (1.3) fLm at 250C. The food <br />X temperature interaction was significant (ANO- <br />VA: F = 12.95; df = 1; P = 0.0024). <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Otoliths were present in Colorado squawfish <br />embryos prior to hatching in all the 18, 22, and <br /> <br />260C temperature treatments tested. These tem- <br />peratures represent the known range over which <br />Colorado squawfish successfully spawn (Nesler et <br />al. 1988; Tyus and Haines 1991; Bestgen and Wil- <br />liams 1994), suggesting that all wild Colorado <br />squawfish larvae should have otoliths prior to <br />hatching. <br />Daily increment deposition in otoliths of Col- <br />orado squawfish was verified for larvae reared in <br />all fluctuating and constant temperature regimes <br />from 18 to 260C, a range that approximates tem- <br />peratures expected in the wild. Otoliths from fish <br />reared at a constant temperature were more diffi- <br />cult to age accurately than those from fluctuating <br />temperatures. Similarly, Campana (1984) and <br />Neilson and Geen (1985) found that plainfin mid- <br />shipman Porichthys notatus and chinook salmon <br />Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, respectively, deposit- <br />ed daily otolith increments in both constant and <br />fluctuating temperature environments, but that in- <br />crements were of higher contrast in fish reared in <br />fluctuating than in constant temperatures. <br />Only dark, high-contrast increments were count- <br />ed in this study. Occasional problems with lighter, <br />lower-contrast, subdaily increments were reduced <br />by keeping the microscope focal plane near the <br />middle of the otolith. Dark, high-contrast otolith <br />increments should be present in wild Colorado <br />squawfish because water temperature in the wild <br />exhibits regular daily fluctuations, reducing the <br />potential for deposition of nondaily increments <br />and for age estimation bias. <br />Temperature may affect otolith and somatic <br />growth independently due to temperature-medi- <br />ated rates of fish metabolism (Mosegaard et al. <br />1988; Wright 1991; Bradford and Geen 1992) or <br />complex temperature interactions with the endog- <br />enous circadian rhythm of otolith calcification and <br />matrix deposition (Secor and Dean 1992). In this <br />study, otoliths were smaller in fish reared at l80C <br />than in fish reared with constant or fluctuating <br />220C or fluctuating 260C, suggesting a positive re- <br />lationship between temperature and otolith growth <br />independent of somatic growth rate. However, a <br />direct influence of temperature on otolith growth <br />could not be demonstrated because the colinear <br />effect of temperature on somatic growth of Col- <br />orado squawfish (Bestgen 1996) could not be re- <br />moved. <br />Fast- and slow-growing Colorado squawfish <br />showed differing relationships between body <br />length and lapillus diameter indicating that so- <br />matic and otolith growth rates were not propor- <br />tional. Separate relationships of total length or oto- <br />