My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8021
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8021
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and J. M. Bundy
Title
Environmental Factors Affect Daily Increment Deposition and Otolith Growth in Young Colorado Squawfish
USFW Year
1998
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />112 <br /> <br />BESTGEN AND BUNDY <br /> <br />temperature was constant at 220C or fluctuated <br />around that level (Figure 4). However, otolith <br />growth was maintained through starvation in both <br />temperature treatments. Before starvation, somatic <br />growth was slightly faster with fluctuating tem- <br />perature (mean, 2.3 mm TL) than with constant <br />temperature (1.9 mm), but it was similar in the 6- <br />d period after feeding was resumed (means = 1.5 <br />mm versus 1.4 mm). Otolith increments were of <br />relatively high contrast before, during, and after <br />the starvation period. <br />In experiment 3, food was withheld from 6-d- <br />old fish for 5, 10, 15, or 17.5 d to determine effects <br />of the starvation period on otolith and fish growth. <br />During the first 5 d of starvation (to age 11 d), <br />otolith and somatic growth rates of larvae in all <br />treatments remained similar to those of continu- <br />ously fed control fish (Figure 5). Fish in the 5-d <br />starvation treatment showed a delayed effect of <br />starvation in that their body lengths and lapillus <br />diameters were smaller than control values at day <br />16. In the 10-, 15-, and 17.5-d treatments, somatic <br />growth was largely arrested by the time fish were <br />11 d old, but otoliths continued to grow in fish up <br />to day 21. After feeding resumed, somatic growth <br />of fish in the 10-, 15-, and 17.5-day treatments <br />increased immediately, but it did not reach the <br />control rate until fish had fed for 2.5-5 d. Con- <br />versely, otoliths grew only slowly or not at all for <br />the first 2.5-5 d of resumed feeding; after 5 d, <br />otolith growth was nearly that of controls. <br />Width and contrast of otolith growth increments <br />was not reduced during the first 5-d starvation pe- <br />riod. However, the space on the otolith correspond- <br />ing to starvation periods longer than 5 d was gen- <br />erally opaque throughout and daily increments <br />were more difficult to distinguish. Daily incre- <br />ments deposited after fish resumed feeding were <br />dark and of high contrast, but that quality was <br />apparent only 1-2 d after the starvation period. <br />In the absence of food, a temperature difference <br />of 70C had little effect on otolith growth (exper- <br />iment 4). After 7 d of starvation, lapillus diameters <br />of 21-d-old larvae averaged 148 fLm (SE, 5.3) for <br />the 180C treatment and 152 (3.5) fLm for the 250C <br />treatment. When fish were fed continuously <br />through day 21, lapillus diameters were 173 (5.3) <br />fLm at l80C and 206 (1.3) fLm at 250C. The food <br />X temperature interaction was significant (ANO- <br />VA: F = 12.95; df = 1; P = 0.0024). <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Otoliths were present in Colorado squawfish <br />embryos prior to hatching in all the 18, 22, and <br /> <br />260C temperature treatments tested. These tem- <br />peratures represent the known range over which <br />Colorado squawfish successfully spawn (Nesler et <br />al. 1988; Tyus and Haines 1991; Bestgen and Wil- <br />liams 1994), suggesting that all wild Colorado <br />squawfish larvae should have otoliths prior to <br />hatching. <br />Daily increment deposition in otoliths of Col- <br />orado squawfish was verified for larvae reared in <br />all fluctuating and constant temperature regimes <br />from 18 to 260C, a range that approximates tem- <br />peratures expected in the wild. Otoliths from fish <br />reared at a constant temperature were more diffi- <br />cult to age accurately than those from fluctuating <br />temperatures. Similarly, Campana (1984) and <br />Neilson and Geen (1985) found that plainfin mid- <br />shipman Porichthys notatus and chinook salmon <br />Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, respectively, deposit- <br />ed daily otolith increments in both constant and <br />fluctuating temperature environments, but that in- <br />crements were of higher contrast in fish reared in <br />fluctuating than in constant temperatures. <br />Only dark, high-contrast increments were count- <br />ed in this study. Occasional problems with lighter, <br />lower-contrast, subdaily increments were reduced <br />by keeping the microscope focal plane near the <br />middle of the otolith. Dark, high-contrast otolith <br />increments should be present in wild Colorado <br />squawfish because water temperature in the wild <br />exhibits regular daily fluctuations, reducing the <br />potential for deposition of nondaily increments <br />and for age estimation bias. <br />Temperature may affect otolith and somatic <br />growth independently due to temperature-medi- <br />ated rates of fish metabolism (Mosegaard et al. <br />1988; Wright 1991; Bradford and Geen 1992) or <br />complex temperature interactions with the endog- <br />enous circadian rhythm of otolith calcification and <br />matrix deposition (Secor and Dean 1992). In this <br />study, otoliths were smaller in fish reared at l80C <br />than in fish reared with constant or fluctuating <br />220C or fluctuating 260C, suggesting a positive re- <br />lationship between temperature and otolith growth <br />independent of somatic growth rate. However, a <br />direct influence of temperature on otolith growth <br />could not be demonstrated because the colinear <br />effect of temperature on somatic growth of Col- <br />orado squawfish (Bestgen 1996) could not be re- <br />moved. <br />Fast- and slow-growing Colorado squawfish <br />showed differing relationships between body <br />length and lapillus diameter indicating that so- <br />matic and otolith growth rates were not propor- <br />tional. Separate relationships of total length or oto- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.