Laserfiche WebLink
<br />108 <br /> <br />BESTGEN AND BUNDY <br /> <br />each of five 3.8-L aerated jars representing 0, 5, <br />10, 15, and l7.5-d-long starvation treatments. <br />Temperature was constant at 2loC (Table 1). Up <br />to 10 specimens were sampled from each treatment <br />0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 28 d after the experiment <br />began. Mean survival, measured in three replicate <br />beakers for each treatment, was 87-95% for all <br />treatments except 17.5 d, where survival was 57% <br />(Bestgen 1996). Because survival was high in all <br />but one treatment, otolith and somatic growth ef- <br />fects should not have been confounded by differ- <br />ential survival or density. Mean otolith size and <br />TL were measured for five specimens per treatment <br />per sampling occasion to determine if otolith <br />growth rates reflected changes in fish length as <br />influenced by food availability. <br />Experiment 4 was conducted to determine ef- <br />fects of a temperature increase and of the time of <br />first feeding on otolith growth in early life stages <br />of Colorado squawfish. Five unfed 6-d-old larvae <br />from a stock held at 250C were placed in each of <br />four 2-L aquaria and maintained without feeding <br />in an l80C water bath until fish were 14 d old. <br />Two aquaria were then randomly assigned to a <br />constant temperature treatment of 18 or 250C (Ta- <br />ble 1). Fish in one randomly chosen aquarium in <br />each temperature treatment were fed for the 7-d <br />treatment period; the others were unfed. The 21- <br />d-old fish were sacrificed and measured to nearest <br />0.1 mm TL, and diameters of their lapilli were <br />measured. Differences in fish otolith growth be- <br />tween treatments were compared via two-factor <br />analysis of variance (PROC GLM) that had tem- <br />perature (18 or 250C) and food (present or absent) <br />as main effects and the interaction. <br />All statistical analyses were conducted with <br />SAS statistical software (SAS Institute 1988). <br />Plots of data and residuals were used to evaluate <br />normality and heteroscedasticity, and data were <br />transformed when necessary to meet assumptions. <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />Early Otolith Development <br /> <br />Lapillar and sagittal otoliths were present in <br />Colorado squaw fish embryos 1 d before hatch (4 <br />d postfertilization) at incubation temperatures of <br />22 and 260C and 1-2 d before hatch (4 d postfer- <br />tilization) at 180C. Four to eight small, round nu- <br />clei (primordia) formed the otolith core. Subse- <br />quent material was deposited around fused pri- <br />mordia to form round to slightly oval structures. <br />Asterisci (the third otolith pair) were first found <br />in larvae 15 d posthatch. At hatching, the lapillus <br /> <br />and sagitta were similar in size to each other and <br />similar in size at all temperatures, averaging 37.5 <br />f.Lm (range, 32.4-44.3 f.Lm) in diameter. Left and <br />right otoliths were similar in size so the left was <br />used exclusively unless it was lost. A clear, high- <br />contrast otolith increment was deposited the day <br />of hatch in fish reared in all temperature regimes. <br />Embryos incubated at l80C hatched about 1 d later <br />than those incubated at 22 or 260C, and in some <br />cases they had an additional low-contrast incre- <br />ment inside the high-contrast hatch increment. <br /> <br />Age Validation <br /> <br />Increments were deposited daily in the lapillus <br />and sagittae of Colorado squawfish larvae and ju- <br />veniles beginning at hatch; the asteriscus was not <br />present at hatch. Slopes of regression lines for in- <br />crement count versus known age did not differ <br />significantly from 1.0 for constant or fluctuating <br />temperature treatments, for all fluctuating temper- <br />ature treatments combined, or for all treatments <br />combined (Table 2). Intercepts for all relationships <br />were not significantly different from zero, which <br />was the expected value if daily increments were <br />first deposited at hatching. High r2 values and re- <br />sidual plots indicated that all relationships were <br />linear. For all fluctuating temperature treatments, <br />confidence intervals about slope and intercept es- <br />timates were relatively small. For example, a 5% <br />deviation from a hypothesized slope of 1.0 usually <br />would be detected with at least 0.95 pr.obability <br />because confidence intervals did not overlap hy- <br />pothetical slope values of 0.95 and 1.05. Confi- <br />dence intervals (CI) were much wider for the con- <br />stant 220C treatment data than for others. <br />Inverse prediction intervals for estimated age as <br />a function of known age were much narrower for <br />fluctuating temperature treatments (CI, :t7-8 d) <br />than for the constant 220C treatment (:t18 d). Pre- <br />diction intervals for known age calculated for fish <br />less than 25 d old (:S12.5 mm TL) were :t2.5 d <br />for fish reared with fluctuating temperatures but <br />:t 5 d for fish reared at constant temperature. Oto- <br />liths growing at constant temperature had more <br />subdaily increments and lower overall increment <br />contrast, leading to less accurate enumeration, than <br />otoliths subjected to fluctuating temperatures. <br />The ANCOV A did not detect a significant dif- <br />ference between readers in the slopes (age X read- <br />er term) or intercepts (reader term) for regressions <br />of estimated versus true age for larvae reared at <br />220C (Table 3). Mean ages estimated by reader 1 <br />(41.5 d; SE, 0.845) and reader 2 (40.4 d; SE, 0.840) <br />was 1.1 d (CI, :t2.35). Data from the two treat- <br />