My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8021
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8021
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and J. M. Bundy
Title
Environmental Factors Affect Daily Increment Deposition and Otolith Growth in Young Colorado Squawfish
USFW Year
1998
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OTOLITH MICROSTRUCTURE OF COLORADO SQUAWFISH <br /> <br />107 <br /> <br />crements of each otolith were counted three times <br />by the senior author without knowledge of the <br />treatment. The three counts were averaged. A sec- <br />ond experienced reader also counted increments <br />for the 220C treatments (constant and fluctuating <br />temperatures) to determine the extent of reader <br />variation or systematic bias. <br />Each otolith increment consisted of a relatively <br />wide, light-opaque inner band (L-zone) and a rel- <br />atively narrow and dark outside band (D-zone; ter- <br />minology after Kalish et al. 1995). The first in- <br />crement was one of relatively high contrast (dis- <br />tinct L-zone) that surrounded the otolith core. The <br />outer margins of otoliths examined for age vali- <br />dation were almost always opaque. We interpreted <br />this as representing the L-zone for the day the fish <br />was sampled and counted it as the last increment. <br />We used least-squares regression of increment <br />count (dependent variable) as a function of known <br />age (independent variable) to test the hypotheses <br />that (1) increments were first formed at hatch and <br />(2) that detectable increments were formed daily. <br />Regression intercepts not significantly different <br />than zero (increment count == 0 at hatch) would <br />support hypothesis (1), and regression slopes not <br />significantly different from one would support hy- <br />pothesis (2) (e.g., Rice 1987). Instead of con- <br />ducting retrospective (a posteriori) power analysis <br />to detect the likelihood of type II statistical errors <br />and an arbitrary effect size, we calculated confi- <br />dence intervals about intercept and slope esti- <br />mates. Like power analysis, which is mostly a pro- <br />spective (a priori) experimental design tool (Steidl <br />et al. 1997), confidence intervals allow assessment <br />of the magnitude of effect that is detectable with <br />the data and offer straightforward measures of the <br />reliability of parameter estimates. Because age of <br />wild fish will be estimated from counts of daily <br />increments, prediction intervals were calculated <br />for known (true) age (independent variable) via <br />inverse regression (Draper and Smith 1981; Rice <br />1987) instead of for estimated age (dependent vari- <br />able). <br />Analysis of covariance (ANCOV A) was used <br />both to investigate reader bias (via comparisons of <br />estimated age with true age) and to detect effects <br />of temperature on periodicity of increment for- <br />mation. The ANCOV A interaction of treatment X <br />class variable (reader or temperature) and the class <br />variable terms of the analysis tested for homoge- <br />neity of regression line slopes and intercepts, re- <br />spectively, among treatments. In addition to hy- <br />pothesis tests such as ANCOV A that determine if <br />treatments were statistically significant, least- <br /> <br />squares means (population marginal means; Searle <br />et al. 1980) were calculated for groups (or treat- <br />ments) after covariates were accounted for. Dif- <br />ferences between treatment means and confidence <br />intervals around those differences give informa- <br />tion about the biological significance of treat- <br />ments, regardless of results of statistical tests <br />(Yoccoz 1991; Johnson 1995). <br />Preserved specimens were used to assess rela- <br />tionships between otolith size and fish total length <br />and to calculate slope and intercept parameters for <br />use in back-calculation of fish lengths at previous <br />ages (Carlander 1981). Effects of temperature lev- <br />el and regime (constant or fluctuating) on otolith <br />growth were tested by ANCOV A. <br /> <br />Growth Effects <br /> <br />Variables affecting otolith and somatic (body <br />length) growth were studied in four experiments. <br />Experiment 1 was to determine if otolith growth <br />rates were directly proportional to somatic growth <br />when fish had different somatic growth rates. Fish <br />from single slow- and fast-growth treatment aquar- <br />ia (which differed in stocking rate: Table 1) were <br />sampled at 3, 22, 28, 56, 82, and 122 d of age and <br />preserved in 100% ethanol. In this experiment and <br />the ones that follow, individual fish from single <br />aquaria were treated as statistically independent <br />experimental units. Three to 10 specimens per pe- <br />riod and treatment (depending upon availability) <br />were measured for total length (TL), and the left <br />lapillus was removed from each fish and measured <br />as described above. Analysis of covariance and <br />least-squares means were used to compare differ- <br />ences in otolith size between treatments. <br />Experiment 2 was to determine somatic and oto- <br />lith growth rates before, during, and after a 6-d <br />starvation period. Healthy and actively feeding lI- <br />d-old larvae were lightly anaesthetized with tri- <br />caine (MS-222, 100 mglL), measured (TL) under <br />a dissecting microscope fitted with an ocular mi- <br />crometer, allowed to recover, placed in 0.24-L cups <br />(one per cup), and assigned to a temperature treat- <br />ment (constant or fluctuating temperature centered <br />on 220C; Table 1). Each larva was remeasured after <br />6 d more of feeding, after 6 d of starvation, and <br />after 6 d of renewed feeding. Two fish from each <br />treatment regime died during anaesthesia or were <br />physically damaged, so their complete growth his- <br />tories were not available. Diameter of the left la- <br />pillus from each fish was measured at 1,000X mag- <br />nification. <br />In experiment 3, groups of 200 larvae 6 d old <br />(age at first feeding) were randomly assigned to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.