Laserfiche WebLink
<br />326 <br /> <br />ability of data on sediment loads, lack of consistent and clearly defined chan- <br />nel features, or uncertainty whether the stream are in quasi-equilibrium. <br />In order to evaluate the geomorphic significance of the effective discharge, <br />3-5 cross-sectionS were surveyed in the vicinity of each gaging station. The <br />cross-sections were located in a self-formed reach of channels with a well- <br />developed floodplain, so that the bankfull discharge could be identified. The <br />elevation of the floodplain was taken to be the level of the bankfull stage. <br />Secondary geomorphic and botanic features were also noted to verify that <br />the surface was, in fact, the floodplain rather than a terrace. These features <br />include the top of point bars and the lower limit of vegetation. The flood- <br />plain elevations were plotted to give a longitudinal profile of the bankfull <br />stage through the reach of channel including the gaging station. The bankfull <br />discharge was then determined from the stage-discharge relation of the gag- <br />ing station. <br />A typical cross-section of the Little Snake River near Dixon, Wyo., is shown <br />in Fig. 10. The effective discharge and the bankfull discharge are nearly iden- <br />tical. The mean-annual discharge is about 12% of the bankfull and effective <br />discharges. The close agreement between the effective and bankfull discharges <br />indicates that the stream channel is adjusted to the range of discharges that <br />transport the largest part of the annual sediment load. <br />Baker (1977) suggested that relatively rare floods may be the significant <br /> <br />34.5 <br /> <br /> <br />(I) <br />a: <br />w <br />~ 34.0 <br />~ <br />z <br /> <br />Bankfull discharge =114 cubic meters per second <br />Effective discharge = 113 cubic meters per second <br /> <br /> <br />~ 33.5 <br />I- <br /><( <br />o <br />~ 33.0 <br /><( <br />a: <br />I- <br />iij <br />~ 32.5 <br />w <br />> <br />o <br />1XI <br /><( 32.0 <br />z <br />Q <br />I- <br />~ 31.5 <br />w <br />-l <br />W <br /> <br />31.00 <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />20 25 30 35 <br />DISTANCE, IN METERS <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />Fig. 10. Cross-sectional profile of the Little Snake River near Dixon, Wyoming, showing <br />the elevation of the mean-annual, effective and bankfull discharges. <br /> <br />55 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />-. <br />. <br />. <br />