<br />Effects of copper on olfaction of Colorado pikeminnow
<br />
<br />of a fright reaction from remaining fish was evaluated by ap-
<br />plying the criteria during the 1-min interval after introduction
<br />of the skin homogenate.
<br />
<br />Copper concentrations in Colorado pike minnow habitat
<br />
<br />Copper concentrations in the Yampa River near Maybell
<br />were described using data from a U.S. Geological Survey gage
<br />(09251000). Data were obtained from the U.S. Geological Sur-
<br />vey, Water Resources Division, Colorado District (Denver, CO,
<br />USA). All data were used for the period of record from Sep-
<br />tember 1974 to September 1991. The number of observations
<br />ranged from two to four per year with a total of 29 for total
<br />copper and 66 for dissolved copper. Detection limits for total
<br />and dissolved copper ranged from 2 to 20 and 1 to 10 fLg/L,
<br />respectively. Frequency distributions for each constituent were
<br />constructed.
<br />
<br />Scanning electron microscopy
<br />
<br />Scanning electron microscopy was used to examine the
<br />olfactory epithelium of study fish for evidence of damage from
<br />chemical exposure. Sample preparation and analysis followed
<br />Lee [20]. Three fish from the control and each exposure con-
<br />centration were fixed and preserved for SEM by immersion
<br />in 3% glutaraldehyde buffered to pH 7.2 with sodium phos-
<br />phate. Subsequently, all fish were processed as a batch to elim-
<br />inate potential bias from variation in preparation techniques.
<br />Specimens were rinsed with phosphate buffer and postfixed
<br />with 1 % osmium tetroxide (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO,
<br />USA), then dehydrated in a graded acetone series and critical-
<br />point dried in a Polaron apparatus (Bio-Rad, Cambridge, MO,
<br />USA). Individual specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs
<br />with colloidal silver, sputter coated with gold (20-nm thick-
<br />ness; Hummer VII sputtercoater, Anatech, Alexandria, V A,
<br />USA), and examined using a Philips 505 SEM (Einhovn, Hol-
<br />land).
<br />Scanning electron microscopy was used only to confirm
<br />results of behavioral assays because preparation and viewing
<br />of specimens is labor and time intensive. Observations were
<br />made on fish from controls and from the lowest copper con-
<br />centrations that inhibited the fright-reaction response in all
<br />replicates. It was anticipated that olfactory receptors in ex-
<br />posed fish would be less abundant compared with control fish.
<br />To reduce potential for investigator bias, examinations of ol-
<br />factory epithelium were restricted to the same general regions
<br />of the sensory surface. Target regions were systematically sur-
<br />veyed by conducting adjacent parallel scans at x 10,000 mag-
<br />nification with a viewing field of 11.5 X 9.0 fLm for 15 min.
<br />Presence or absence of ciliated receptor cells was recorded.
<br />
<br />Statistical analysis
<br />
<br />Logistic regression was used to analyze the binomial re-
<br />sponse (present or absent) for fright reaction as a function of
<br />concentration and exposure duration. Proc Genmod (with op-
<br />tions link = logit, dist = binomial, dsca1e; [21]) was used to
<br />describe the response as a function of the independent vari-
<br />ables. The full regression model had the form
<br />
<br />logit(p) = [30 + [3jC + [32T + [33CT
<br />
<br />where p = probability of response to skin homogenate, logit(p)
<br />= naturallog[p/(l - p)], [30 = intercept, [3\, [32 = coefficients
<br />for the linear terms of main effects, C = exposure concentra-
<br />tion (fLg/L), T = exposure time (h), and [33 = coefficient of
<br />cross products. The coefficient of cross products tests for equal
<br />
<br />Environ. Toxieol. Chern. 20,2001
<br />
<br />909
<br />
<br />Table 1. Maximum-likelihood parameter estimates and significance
<br />probabilities for a regression model describing probability of fright-
<br />reaction response to skin homogenate by Colorado pikeminnow after
<br />exposure to copper for 24 or 96 h
<br />
<br /> Standard
<br />Parameter Estimate error p
<br />130, intercept 2.70 2.87 0.347
<br />131> 10glO(concentration) -1.86 1.69 0.308
<br />132> exposure time 0.144 0.0901 0.0269
<br />133, 10glO( concentration) X
<br />exposure time -0.0792 0.0520 0.0427
<br />
<br />a Estimates for the regression equation logit(p) = 130 + 131C + 132T
<br />+ 133C T, where p = probability of response to skin homogenate,
<br />logit(p) = natural log [P/(1 - p)], C = exposure concentration (fLg/
<br />L), and T = exposure time (h).
<br />
<br />slopes of the 24- and 96-h concentration-response relation-
<br />ships. A significant coefficient suggests that the regression
<br />lines are not parallel and further analysis is not required to
<br />demonstrate that the concentration-response relationships are
<br />different from each other. It also suggests that the effect of
<br />copper was not consistent at both durations of exposure, i.e.,
<br />there was an interaction of main effects. When an interaction
<br />is detected, statistical tests of main effects cannot be simply
<br />interpreted [22]. Coefficient [31 represents the test for effects
<br />due to concentration gradient; [32 represents the test for effects
<br />due to exposure duration.
<br />Concentrations of copper estimated to inhibit olfaction in
<br />1 and 50% of the test organisms (EC1 and EC50) were also
<br />calculated for each exposure duration using Proc Probit (with
<br />options d = logistic inversecl lackfit; [23]). In this case, the
<br />EC1 was arbitrarily selected as a conservative threshold for
<br />adverse effects on an endangered species. Transformations
<br />(lOglO) were used if they improved the fit of regression models.
<br />Graphical analyses of data and residual plots were conducted
<br />to confirm that regression models were appropriate and to
<br />evaluate compliance with statistical assumptions.
<br />
<br />RESULTS
<br />
<br />Behavioral assay
<br />
<br />Olfactory ability declined as a function of copper concen-
<br />tration after 24- or 96-h exposure, but slopes of the two con-
<br />centration-response relationships were not parallel (Table 1).
<br />There was an interaction (p = 0.0427) between the effects of
<br />copper exposure and exposure time. As a consequence of this
<br />interaction, the influence of copper on olfaction at each ex-
<br />posure time must be evaluated separately. To facilitate eval-
<br />uation, a graph of the probability of response to skin homog-
<br />enate as a function of exposure concentration was constructed
<br />using the regression model (Fig. I). At copper concentrations
<br />below 66 fLg/L (i.e., the point where the lines cross), olfaction
<br />was more sensitive to exposure at 24 h than at 96 h; at higher
<br />concentrations, the opposite relationship was observed.
<br />Behavioral assays conducted after a 14-d recovery period
<br />showed that Colorado pikeminnow exposed to 60.0 fLg/L cop-
<br />per for 96 h regained olfactory ability (Table 2). Immediately
<br />after exposure,S of 10 positive responses to skin homogenate
<br />were elicited from fish in this experimental treatment, whereas
<br />after the recovery period, positive responses were detected in
<br />eight of nine remaining replicates.
<br />The EC1s and 95% confidence limits for 24- and 96-h
<br />copper exposures were 2.61 (0.331,6.24) and 18.3 (1.58, 30.0)
<br />
|