Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Effects of copper on olfaction of Colorado pikeminnow <br /> <br />of a fright reaction from remaining fish was evaluated by ap- <br />plying the criteria during the 1-min interval after introduction <br />of the skin homogenate. <br /> <br />Copper concentrations in Colorado pike minnow habitat <br /> <br />Copper concentrations in the Yampa River near Maybell <br />were described using data from a U.S. Geological Survey gage <br />(09251000). Data were obtained from the U.S. Geological Sur- <br />vey, Water Resources Division, Colorado District (Denver, CO, <br />USA). All data were used for the period of record from Sep- <br />tember 1974 to September 1991. The number of observations <br />ranged from two to four per year with a total of 29 for total <br />copper and 66 for dissolved copper. Detection limits for total <br />and dissolved copper ranged from 2 to 20 and 1 to 10 fLg/L, <br />respectively. Frequency distributions for each constituent were <br />constructed. <br /> <br />Scanning electron microscopy <br /> <br />Scanning electron microscopy was used to examine the <br />olfactory epithelium of study fish for evidence of damage from <br />chemical exposure. Sample preparation and analysis followed <br />Lee [20]. Three fish from the control and each exposure con- <br />centration were fixed and preserved for SEM by immersion <br />in 3% glutaraldehyde buffered to pH 7.2 with sodium phos- <br />phate. Subsequently, all fish were processed as a batch to elim- <br />inate potential bias from variation in preparation techniques. <br />Specimens were rinsed with phosphate buffer and postfixed <br />with 1 % osmium tetroxide (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, <br />USA), then dehydrated in a graded acetone series and critical- <br />point dried in a Polaron apparatus (Bio-Rad, Cambridge, MO, <br />USA). Individual specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs <br />with colloidal silver, sputter coated with gold (20-nm thick- <br />ness; Hummer VII sputtercoater, Anatech, Alexandria, V A, <br />USA), and examined using a Philips 505 SEM (Einhovn, Hol- <br />land). <br />Scanning electron microscopy was used only to confirm <br />results of behavioral assays because preparation and viewing <br />of specimens is labor and time intensive. Observations were <br />made on fish from controls and from the lowest copper con- <br />centrations that inhibited the fright-reaction response in all <br />replicates. It was anticipated that olfactory receptors in ex- <br />posed fish would be less abundant compared with control fish. <br />To reduce potential for investigator bias, examinations of ol- <br />factory epithelium were restricted to the same general regions <br />of the sensory surface. Target regions were systematically sur- <br />veyed by conducting adjacent parallel scans at x 10,000 mag- <br />nification with a viewing field of 11.5 X 9.0 fLm for 15 min. <br />Presence or absence of ciliated receptor cells was recorded. <br /> <br />Statistical analysis <br /> <br />Logistic regression was used to analyze the binomial re- <br />sponse (present or absent) for fright reaction as a function of <br />concentration and exposure duration. Proc Genmod (with op- <br />tions link = logit, dist = binomial, dsca1e; [21]) was used to <br />describe the response as a function of the independent vari- <br />ables. The full regression model had the form <br /> <br />logit(p) = [30 + [3jC + [32T + [33CT <br /> <br />where p = probability of response to skin homogenate, logit(p) <br />= naturallog[p/(l - p)], [30 = intercept, [3\, [32 = coefficients <br />for the linear terms of main effects, C = exposure concentra- <br />tion (fLg/L), T = exposure time (h), and [33 = coefficient of <br />cross products. The coefficient of cross products tests for equal <br /> <br />Environ. Toxieol. Chern. 20,2001 <br /> <br />909 <br /> <br />Table 1. Maximum-likelihood parameter estimates and significance <br />probabilities for a regression model describing probability of fright- <br />reaction response to skin homogenate by Colorado pikeminnow after <br />exposure to copper for 24 or 96 h <br /> <br /> Standard <br />Parameter Estimate error p <br />130, intercept 2.70 2.87 0.347 <br />131> 10glO(concentration) -1.86 1.69 0.308 <br />132> exposure time 0.144 0.0901 0.0269 <br />133, 10glO( concentration) X <br />exposure time -0.0792 0.0520 0.0427 <br /> <br />a Estimates for the regression equation logit(p) = 130 + 131C + 132T <br />+ 133C T, where p = probability of response to skin homogenate, <br />logit(p) = natural log [P/(1 - p)], C = exposure concentration (fLg/ <br />L), and T = exposure time (h). <br /> <br />slopes of the 24- and 96-h concentration-response relation- <br />ships. A significant coefficient suggests that the regression <br />lines are not parallel and further analysis is not required to <br />demonstrate that the concentration-response relationships are <br />different from each other. It also suggests that the effect of <br />copper was not consistent at both durations of exposure, i.e., <br />there was an interaction of main effects. When an interaction <br />is detected, statistical tests of main effects cannot be simply <br />interpreted [22]. Coefficient [31 represents the test for effects <br />due to concentration gradient; [32 represents the test for effects <br />due to exposure duration. <br />Concentrations of copper estimated to inhibit olfaction in <br />1 and 50% of the test organisms (EC1 and EC50) were also <br />calculated for each exposure duration using Proc Probit (with <br />options d = logistic inversecl lackfit; [23]). In this case, the <br />EC1 was arbitrarily selected as a conservative threshold for <br />adverse effects on an endangered species. Transformations <br />(lOglO) were used if they improved the fit of regression models. <br />Graphical analyses of data and residual plots were conducted <br />to confirm that regression models were appropriate and to <br />evaluate compliance with statistical assumptions. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Behavioral assay <br /> <br />Olfactory ability declined as a function of copper concen- <br />tration after 24- or 96-h exposure, but slopes of the two con- <br />centration-response relationships were not parallel (Table 1). <br />There was an interaction (p = 0.0427) between the effects of <br />copper exposure and exposure time. As a consequence of this <br />interaction, the influence of copper on olfaction at each ex- <br />posure time must be evaluated separately. To facilitate eval- <br />uation, a graph of the probability of response to skin homog- <br />enate as a function of exposure concentration was constructed <br />using the regression model (Fig. I). At copper concentrations <br />below 66 fLg/L (i.e., the point where the lines cross), olfaction <br />was more sensitive to exposure at 24 h than at 96 h; at higher <br />concentrations, the opposite relationship was observed. <br />Behavioral assays conducted after a 14-d recovery period <br />showed that Colorado pikeminnow exposed to 60.0 fLg/L cop- <br />per for 96 h regained olfactory ability (Table 2). Immediately <br />after exposure,S of 10 positive responses to skin homogenate <br />were elicited from fish in this experimental treatment, whereas <br />after the recovery period, positive responses were detected in <br />eight of nine remaining replicates. <br />The EC1s and 95% confidence limits for 24- and 96-h <br />copper exposures were 2.61 (0.331,6.24) and 18.3 (1.58, 30.0) <br />