Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TEMPERATURE REQUIREMENTS OF RAZORBACK SUCKERS <br /> <br />605 <br /> <br />~ <br />t <br /> <br />to 14 C is that cold-acclimated (< 15 C) fish <br />initially may overshoot their final preferendum, <br />Other workers have reported that by the third <br />or fourth day of testing the final preferendum <br />of cold-acclimated fish equals that of warm-ac- <br />climated fish, and the effect of overshoot is no <br />longer evident (Beitinger and Magnuson 1976; <br />Reynolds 1978), Our razorback suckers were in <br />the shuttlebox for only 2 days, and the pref- <br />erence for high temperature shown by fish ac- <br />climated to 14 C might have proven transient <br />had the tests continued. The estimate of final <br />preferendum of razorback suckers acclimated <br />to 8 C was also higher than preferenda of fish <br />acclimated to 20 C and 26 C (Fig, 1), suggesting <br />overshoot, but the difference was not statisti- <br />cally significant, perhaps due to the small sam- <br />ple size of fish acclimated to 8 C. <br />Mathur et at (1981) found strong geographic <br />and taxonomic similarities in acute temperature <br />preferences for several freshwater fishes, Our <br />work with the razorback sucker suggests that <br />these similarities may hold for the final pref- <br />erence temperature as well. Reynolds and Cas- <br />terlin (1978) reported that the final preferen- <br />dum for the white sucker Catastamus commersani <br />was 24.1 C. This value falls within the 94% con- <br />fidence limits of estimates for the razorback <br />sucker based on fish acclimated at 8, 20, and 26 <br />C. In other work in our laboratory, Bulkley et <br />al. (1981) estimated the final preferenda of three <br />other native Colorado River fishes from their <br />acute temperature preference (see Fry 1947; <br />Richards et al. 1977; or Stauffer et al. 1975 for <br />calculation procedures); their estimates agreed <br />closely with the 24,8 C geometric-mean esti- <br />mate for the final preferendum of the razorback <br />sucker: Colorado squawfish ptychacheilus lucius, <br />25.4 C; humpback chub Gila cYPha, 24.0; bony- <br />tail Gila elegans, 24,2 C. <br />Coutant (1975), who surveyed the literature <br />on temperature avoidance and preference of <br />different species of fish, concluded that upper <br />avoidance temperatures appeared to be about <br />2 C above the final thermal preferenda for most <br />species, Data on the white sucker collected by <br />Reynolds and Casterlin (1978) agreed with Cou- <br />tant's observations, Upper avoidance temper- <br />ature for the white sucker was 2.6 C higher than <br />its preferred temperature, In contrast, esti- <br />mates of the upper avoidance temperature of <br />razorback suckers in our study averaged 3,7 C <br />(range, 2.4-5.3 C) above the estimated final pre- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />ferendum. The reason for this greater differ- <br />ence between upper avoidance and final pref- <br />erence temperature for razorback suckers is <br />attributed to our method of estimating avoid- <br />ance. Had we estimated upper avoidance tem- <br />perature during the second day of testing, rath- <br />er than the first, its deviation from the final <br />preferendum would agree with Coutant's gen- <br />erality because of the much narrower range of <br />temperatures experienced by razorback suckers <br />as they closed in on their final preferendum, <br />Hence, our more liberal estimates of upper and <br />lower avoidance should fully encompass the <br />temperature range tolerated by adult razorback <br />suckers in nature, <br />The behavior of razorback suckers acclimat- <br />ed to 8 and 14 C was similar to that of other <br />species with prior exposure to low temperatures <br />(Mathur et al. 1981). Many of the razorback <br />suckers held at low temperatures sought in- <br />creasingly higher temperatures until they died, <br />or at least they did not avoid lethally high tem- <br />peratures. That is, their upper avoidance tem- <br />perature exceeded the critical thermal maxi- <br />mum as described by Reynolds and Casterlin <br />(1979). Other fish were responsive but less pre- <br />cise than fish acclimated to a higher tempera- <br />ture and overshot the final preferendum, A <br />physiological explanation for this fatal behavior <br />is that temperature reduction slows down met- <br />abolic rate, including rate of cerebral activity <br />of fish (Stascheit 1979), Acclimation rate for <br />behavior obviously differs from that of temper- <br />ature tolerance, Threadfin shad Darasama pete- <br />nense exposed to low temperatures lost orien- <br />tation and became insensitive to external stimuli <br />(Griffith 1978). Doudoroff (1942) described such <br />behavior as the primary chill coma. Humans <br />suffering from hypothermia similarly lose men- <br />tal acuity and ability to respond appropriately <br />to external stimuli (Guyton 1966). <br />The lower avoidance temperature and ther- <br />mal preferenda presented here support state- <br />ments that temperature change was involved in <br />disappearance of razorback suckers and the <br />three other native endangered species from the <br />tail waters of Flaming Gorge Reservoir on the <br />Green River, Utah (Holden 1978; Behnke and <br />Benson 1980; McAda and Wydoski 1980), After <br />construction of the dam in 1963, mean summer <br />Qune-September) water temperature in the riv- <br />er below the dam dropped from about 18 C to <br />6.8 C (Vanicek and Kramer 1969). Annual post- <br />