My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8008
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:13:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8008
Author
Haines, G. B., S. H. Severson and T. Modde.
Title
Evaluation of Batch Marking Techniques for Culturing the Endangered Razorback Sucker and Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />Young razorback sucker Xyrauchen texans and Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius <br /> <br /> <br />were marked by freeze branding and fluorescent elastic polymer (elastomer), The elastomer implant <br /> <br /> <br />was located at the base of the anal fin and on the operculum (razorback sucker) or lower jaw <br /> <br /> <br />(Colorado squawfish) and consisted of one of four colors: green, blue, red, or orange. Freeze <br /> <br />branding had retention rates of 99% after 15 months for both species, Elastomer recognition was <br /> <br /> <br />better for Colorado squawfish (grand mean 74%) than razorback sucker (grand mean 60%) after 15 <br /> <br /> <br />months, No elastomer location proved to be superior to the others. Red and orange had the best <br /> <br /> <br />recognition, blue the poorest. The red and orange elastomer implant for young Colorado squawfish <br /> <br />had five month retention rates of 95%. Given these results the following recommendations are <br /> <br />proposed, <br />1, Freeze branding had excellent retention for 15 months for both razorback sucker and <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish and could easily substitute for the use of internally implanted passive <br /> <br /> <br />integrated transponder (pIT) tags following the first growing season, <br /> <br /> <br />2, Elastomer recognition, although acceptable for.short time periods (red ~d orange) on <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish, are not recommended for marking fishes if identification is desired <br /> <br />beyone 12 months, <br /> <br /> <br />3, One person implanting elastomer at two locations on each fish and one person <br /> <br />anesthetizing and handling fish can mark 130-140 fish per h, Approximately three times that <br /> <br />number can be freeze-branded per h, The greater retention time and efficiency in marking <br /> <br />makes the use of freeze branding the practical replacement for PIT tagging during the first <br /> <br />two growing seasons of hatchery reared fishes, <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.