|
<br />List of Tables
<br />
<br />Table Page
<br />
<br />1, Dates of marking fish, numbers of fish marked, and dates of checking fish for recognizable
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />marks, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , . , . , , . , , , . , , , , . , , . . , , . , , . . , , , , , , , . . , , , 9
<br />
<br />2. Percent recognition five months after marking young razorback sucker with elastomer
<br />
<br />implanted at the based of the anal fin and on the operculum and freeze branding ..", 1 0
<br />
<br />3, Percent recognition 16 months after marking young razorback sucker with elastomer
<br />
<br />implanted at the base of the anal fm and on the operculum and freeze branding ."". 11
<br />
<br />4. Percent recognition five months after marking young Colorado squawfish with elastomer
<br />
<br />implanted at the base of the anal fin and on the lower jaw and freeze branding. . , , , . . 12
<br />
<br />5. Percent recognition 15 months after marking young Colorado squawfish with elastomer
<br />
<br />implanted at the base of the anal fin and on the lower jaw and freeze branding. . . , . . . 13
<br />
<br />4
<br />
|