My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8056
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:13:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8056
Author
Hamill, J.
Title
Restoring and Protecting Instream Flows for Endangered Fish in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and Mexico warrant protection because of their rarity (Williams <br />et ale 1989). Future losses of fish species can only be expected <br />to increase unless the degradation of natural ecosystems is <br />abated. <br /> <br />since 1978, the Fish and wildlife Service (service) has issued <br />over 160 biological opinions pursuant to section 7 of the <br />Endangered Species Act on the effects of water development <br />projects on the Colorado River endangered fish. These opinions <br />all concluded that the cumulative effects of water depletions <br />from the Upper Colorado River Basin are likely to jeopardize the <br />survival of the endangered fish. In 1984, the Service also <br />produced a draft Conservation Plan that specified minimum flows <br />for the listed fish throughout the upper basin. Several States <br />and water development groups responded that the Service's <br />position on water depletions and minimum streamflows was a direct <br />conflict with State water right systems and Interstate Compacts. <br />The result was that a major controversy threatened to develop and <br />embroil the various State, Federal, and private interests in a <br />confrontation over endangered species protection and water <br />development. However, these parties ultimately recognized that <br />such a confrontation would do little to enhance progress toward <br />recovery of the listed fish or provide greater certainty that new <br />water projects could be developed in the upper basin. As a <br />result, in August 1984, the Service formed the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin Coordinating Committee (Coordinating committee) to <br />provide a forum for discussions. Active participants in the <br />Coordinating Committee included the Service; Bureau of <br />Reclamation (Reclamation); States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming; <br />private water development interests; and environmental groups. <br /> <br />After nearly 4 years of intense discussions, data analyses, and <br />negotiations, the Coordinating Committee produced a plan for <br />recovering the endangered fish entitled the "The Recovery <br />Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin" (Recovery Program) (U.S. Fish and wildlife <br />Service 1987). The plan was formally agreed to by the Secretary <br />of the Interior (on behalf of the Service and Reclamation); the <br />Governors of the States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming; and the <br />Administrator of the Western Area Power Administrator in January <br />1988. Several private water development groups (Colorado Water <br />Congress, Utah Water Users Association, and Wyoming Water Users <br />Association) and environmental groups (National Audubon Society, <br />Environmental Defense Fund, Wyoming Wildlife Federation, and <br />Colorado wildlife Federation) passed formal resolutions in <br />support of the Recovery Program and are now full partners in the <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.