Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />August 25, 1962 <br />The river lost its red color and decreased in turbidity throughout the <br />day. It dropped slightly. Returned to the yampa River about dusk to <br />collect mayflies, but there were none. <br /> <br />General observations at Echo Park <br />(July 29-AUS. 25, 1962) <br /> <br />Water samPling stations. Water samples and temperatures were taken on <br />the Green River directly north of the ranger station. Water samples and <br />temperatures on the Yampa River were taken in two places - in the south <br />channel of the river, and father upstream before the river split into tuo <br />channels. <br /> <br />Hater. The color of the water varied on certain ~a. Some days the <br />water would be a deep red color, and on others, a brown or yellow color. <br />M:>st ofH the time the water was a very light green color. Turbidity varied <br />from turbid to very turbid. It could be considered turbid most o'f thet1me. <br />Chemical analyses were made numerous t1mes on both rivers and at different <br />times at the day. On the Green River, the pH did not fluctuate from the <br />7.5 mark. The dissolved oxygen varied from 6.8 - 8.0 p. p. m. phth. varied <br />from 0 p.p.m. to 10 p.p.m.; M.O. varried from 121 p.p.m. to 151 p.p.m. The <br />pH on the Yampa river was always 7.5. The dissolved oxygen varied trom <br />6.0 p.p.m. to 8.1 p.p.m. phth. varied trom 0 p.p.m. to 10 p.p.m. l-LO. <br />varied from 123 p.p.m. to 141 p.p.m. <br /> <br />Bottom. The bottom type on the Green River in Echo Park is pr1ma.rllY <br />rubble with some silt and sand mixed into the rubble. The bottom types on <br />the Yam,pa in this area was predominantly sand with some large rocks and <br />boulders in places. <br /> <br />Vegetation. Vegetation in the Green River would be considered sparse. <br />There were small amounts of algae clinging to the rubble in most areas. <br />Vegetat ion in the Yampa. was somewhat more dense in the Yampa than in the <br />Green, although it still could be considered sparse. There was enough algae <br />on the bottom to give the water a green color. Depth of visibility was <br />between 3 and 4 feet. <br /> <br />Temperature. The water temperature on both rivers changed according <br />to weather conditions. Dur1nga.24-hour period!, the water temperature <br />changed from a low of 65.00F. to a high of 72.0 F. The highest water <br />tempera.ture that I recorded on the Green River was 720-,. The highest <br />temperature that I recorded on the Yampa River was 74. OF. The Green usually <br />ran several degrees cooler than the Yampa River, sometimes a difference in <br />temperature of 4 or 5~. was observed. <br /> <br />Shore. Deep canyon areas on all sides. The shoreline on the upper <br />end of the study area consisted of sandbar, ",hile the lower portion of the <br />study area consisted of rather high banks with trees (mostly l3oxelder) and <br />other vegetation along them. <br /> <br />Current. 'I'he current in the Green River in this area could be considered <br />as changing from rapid at the upper end of the area to moderate at the lower <br />end. The current in the Yampa was SlO'I. <br /> <br />:a?4= <br /> <br />~~~~~~,,""''''_''''_'_''j~_''-'''''''_'"-''''''''''''''''''''''''~-f'r:-'' <br />