Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hubert and Patton: Fish Catches with Hoop Nets <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Table2. Catch per unit effort (fish/1 00 net-nights) of the six most abundant fish <br />species captured with two types of hoop nets in the Laramie River in 1991 and <br />1992. Standard error in parentheses. <br /> <br /> 1991 <br />Species D Round <br />Common Carp3 6.28 (1.00) 6.50 (1.58) <br />Northern red horse 3.23 (0.99) 1.13 (0.43) <br />White sucker2,3,4 13.56 (1.68) 10.84 (1.89) <br />Longnose sucker3.4 1.45 (0.40) 0.97 (0.50) <br />Channel catfish 4.26 (0.79) 5.21 (1.47) <br />Small mouth bass1,2 3.20 (0.86) 9.21 (2.14) <br /> <br />1992 <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />Round <br /> <br />2.16 (0.53) <br />5.36 (1.83) <br />25.09 (2.89) <br />3.52 (0.69) <br />3.14 (0.90) <br />1.20 (0.33) <br /> <br />2.32 (0.67) <br />2.72 (0.70) <br />41.80 (5.64) <br />4.07 (1.04) <br />3.14 (0.96) <br />5.37 (1.29) <br /> <br />I Significant difference between net types in 1991. <br />2Significant difference between net types in 1992. <br />3Significant difference between 1991 and 1992 with 0 nets. <br />4significant difference between 1991 and 1992 with round nets. <br /> <br />the two most upstream sites, and the CPUE of channel catfish tended to increase <br />with upstream progression. <br />The CPUE also differed among sampling months (Fig. 3). In 1991, CPUE <br />differed significantly among months with D nets for white suckers, and with round <br />nets for longnose suckers. In 1992, significant differences in CPUE among months <br />were observed with D nets for common carp and longnose suckers, and with round <br />nets for longnose suckers. Similar patterns of CPUE among months were seen with <br />both nets for common carp during 1991 and 1992, but were lacking for other species. <br />The total lengths of fish captured with D nets or round nets did not differ <br />significantly for common carp, longnose suckers, channel catfish, or smallmouth <br />bass. However, common carp less than 400 mm were captured only with D nets <br />(12.1 % of sample). Also, smallmouth bass less than 225 mm made up 60.7% of the <br />D-net sample, but only 44.1 % of the round-net sample. Significantly smaller mean <br />lengths of northern redhorse (P = 0.0203) and white suckers (P = 0.00(1) were <br />captured with D nets than with round nets. Also, northern redhorse less than 400 mm <br />were captured only with D nets (12.5 % of sample). Fifty percent of the white suckers <br />captured in D nets were less than 400 mm, while only 19.1 % of the white suckers <br />in round nets were less than 400 mm. The D nets seemed to capture smaller common <br />carp, northern redhorse, white suckers, and smallmouth bass than round nets. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Our goal was to compare the catch efficiency between D nets and conven- <br />tional round nets. We expected that the CPUE of many of the fishes in the Laramie <br />River would be higher with D nets. Our findings did not meet our expectations. <br />When CPUE differed between the two types of nets, the catch rates were higher with <br />round nets. <br />