My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8082
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:10:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8082
Author
Hubert, W. A. and T. M. Patton
Title
Fish Catches with Hoop Nets of Two Designs in the Laramie River, Wyoming
USFW Year
1994
USFW - Doc Type
Prairie Naturalist
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Hubert and Patton: Fish Catches with Hoop Nets <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Table2. Catch per unit effort (fish/1 00 net-nights) of the six most abundant fish <br />species captured with two types of hoop nets in the Laramie River in 1991 and <br />1992. Standard error in parentheses. <br /> <br /> 1991 <br />Species D Round <br />Common Carp3 6.28 (1.00) 6.50 (1.58) <br />Northern red horse 3.23 (0.99) 1.13 (0.43) <br />White sucker2,3,4 13.56 (1.68) 10.84 (1.89) <br />Longnose sucker3.4 1.45 (0.40) 0.97 (0.50) <br />Channel catfish 4.26 (0.79) 5.21 (1.47) <br />Small mouth bass1,2 3.20 (0.86) 9.21 (2.14) <br /> <br />1992 <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />Round <br /> <br />2.16 (0.53) <br />5.36 (1.83) <br />25.09 (2.89) <br />3.52 (0.69) <br />3.14 (0.90) <br />1.20 (0.33) <br /> <br />2.32 (0.67) <br />2.72 (0.70) <br />41.80 (5.64) <br />4.07 (1.04) <br />3.14 (0.96) <br />5.37 (1.29) <br /> <br />I Significant difference between net types in 1991. <br />2Significant difference between net types in 1992. <br />3Significant difference between 1991 and 1992 with 0 nets. <br />4significant difference between 1991 and 1992 with round nets. <br /> <br />the two most upstream sites, and the CPUE of channel catfish tended to increase <br />with upstream progression. <br />The CPUE also differed among sampling months (Fig. 3). In 1991, CPUE <br />differed significantly among months with D nets for white suckers, and with round <br />nets for longnose suckers. In 1992, significant differences in CPUE among months <br />were observed with D nets for common carp and longnose suckers, and with round <br />nets for longnose suckers. Similar patterns of CPUE among months were seen with <br />both nets for common carp during 1991 and 1992, but were lacking for other species. <br />The total lengths of fish captured with D nets or round nets did not differ <br />significantly for common carp, longnose suckers, channel catfish, or smallmouth <br />bass. However, common carp less than 400 mm were captured only with D nets <br />(12.1 % of sample). Also, smallmouth bass less than 225 mm made up 60.7% of the <br />D-net sample, but only 44.1 % of the round-net sample. Significantly smaller mean <br />lengths of northern redhorse (P = 0.0203) and white suckers (P = 0.00(1) were <br />captured with D nets than with round nets. Also, northern redhorse less than 400 mm <br />were captured only with D nets (12.5 % of sample). Fifty percent of the white suckers <br />captured in D nets were less than 400 mm, while only 19.1 % of the white suckers <br />in round nets were less than 400 mm. The D nets seemed to capture smaller common <br />carp, northern redhorse, white suckers, and smallmouth bass than round nets. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Our goal was to compare the catch efficiency between D nets and conven- <br />tional round nets. We expected that the CPUE of many of the fishes in the Laramie <br />River would be higher with D nets. Our findings did not meet our expectations. <br />When CPUE differed between the two types of nets, the catch rates were higher with <br />round nets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.