Laserfiche WebLink
<br />144 <br /> <br />HAMILTON ET AL. <br /> <br />locations where they were collected by light trapping. On <br />the other hand, larvae used in the Ouray study (Hamilton et <br />aI., 1996) were spawned from hatchery-held adults that were <br />induced to spawn by injection of hormones. Larvae in the <br />Ouray study came from two spawns, whereas the wild <br />larvae probably came from several adults that had spawned <br />under natural conditions. Studies with Pacific salmon (On- <br />corhynchus sp.) found that wild fish had higher survival rates <br />than hatchery-reared fish (Felton et al., 1990). Similarly, the <br />hatchery-spawned larval razorback sucker may have been <br />less fit to deal with stresses than wild-spawned larvae. Con- <br />sequently, larvae used in the Ouray study might have been <br />more sensitive to stressors than wild larvae. Nevertheless, <br />based on the available literature summarized in Table 4, <br />whole-body residues measured in wild razorback sucker <br />larvae were comparable to residues in other species where <br />adverse effects on survival and growth were observed. <br /> <br />Other Inorganic Elements in Larvae <br /> <br />A few inorganic elements seemed elevated in the ICP-MS <br />scan of the composite sample of larvae from Stewart Lake <br />Drain. The concentration of cadmium in larvae was <br />4.9 !J.g/g, which was greater than the maximum concentra- <br />tion of 0.8 !J.g/g reported in the NCBP (Schmitt and Brum- <br />baugh, 1990). Values in the NCBP were given as wet weight <br />tissue concentrations. For comparison purposes, those <br />values were converted to dry weight concentrations by <br />assuming 73.8% moisture in whole-body fish tissue, which <br />was the average for the percentage moisture in 315 fish <br />samples collected as part of the NCBP (Schmitt and Brum- <br />baugh, 1990). The concentration of copper in larvae was <br />40 /lg/g, which was greater than the 85th percentile value of <br />3.82 /lg/g, but less than the maximum concentration of <br />88.2 /lg!g in the NCBP. The concentration of lead in larvae <br />was 3.8 /lg/g, which was greater than the 85th percentile <br />value of 0.84 /lg/g, but less than the maximum value of <br />18.6/lg!g in the NCBP. The concentrations of selenium in <br />larvae were 5.8 and 8.0/lg/g, which were greater than the <br />85th percentile value of 2.8 !J.g/g and close to the maximum <br />value of 8.8 /lg!g in the NCBP. The concentration of zinc in <br />larvae was 299/lg/g, which was greater than the 85th per- <br />centile value of 1311-lgjg, but less than the maximum value <br />of 452 /lg!g in the NCBP. The concentration of arsenic in <br />larvae was not elevated compared to the NCBP data. Mer- <br />cury and strontium were not measured in the larvae, but <br />have been reported as inorganic elements of concern in <br />water, sediment, or biota in the Green River (Stephens et ai., <br />1988, 1992; Peltz and Waddell, 1991; Finger et aI., 1994; <br />Hamilton et aI., 1996). <br />Mount et aI. (1994) investigated cadmium, copper, lead, <br />and zinc individually in the diet with 33-day-old rainbow <br />trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for 60 days. He reported no <br />effects on survival or growth at residue concentrations in <br /> <br />fish of 6.8 /lg/g for cadmium, 36 /lgig for copper. 10 /lg g for <br />lead, and 303 /lg!g for zinc. Each of these concentrations <br />were close to or greater than the concentrations in larvae for <br />the present study. Consequently, cadmium, copper, lead. and <br />zinc residues in the razorback sucker larvae in the present <br />study may not be elevated to concentrations of concern. <br />Vanadium concentrations in razorback sucker larvae <br />(1.7 /lg!g) were close to a residue value of 2.05 \.lg!g present <br />in rainbow trout that had reduced growth and reduced <br />feeding response (Hilton and Bettger, 1988). Consequently. <br />vanadium seems to be the only element, other than sel- <br />enium, elevated sufficiently in larvae to be of concern. <br /> <br />CONCLl'S[O~ <br /> <br />The range of selenium in wild razorback sucker larvae in <br />the present study was as low as 3/lg/g as a whole-body <br />residue, which suggests that if larvae from adults with low <br />selenium residues drift to a relatively low selenium area, <br />they probably will survive to the juvenile life stage. In fact, <br />this scenario apparently happened at Old Charlie Wash, as <br />evidenced by the collection of 28 young of year razorback <br />sucker in 1995 (Modde, 1996) and 45 in 1996 (Modde, 1997). <br />However, if larvae start out with low selenium residues. as <br />occurred at Cliff Creek and Stewart Lake Drain, then accu- <br />mulate selenium through waterborne and dietary exposures <br />to concentrations greater than the toxic threshold of 4 /lg/g, <br />there seems little likelihood of their survival to the juvenile <br />stage. Conversely, larvae with elevated selenium concentra- <br />tions, such as those at Sportsman's Drain, can reduce their <br />selenium burden by depuration if larvae can reach a rela- <br />tively clean nursery area. Nevertheless, the widespread pres- <br />ence of elevated selenium residues, i.e., >4/lg/g, in larval <br />razorback sucker from Cliff Creek to Old Charlie Wash <br />inlet suggests that widespread selenium contamination of <br />the Green River is occurring and may be adversely affecting <br />the reproductive success of the endangered razorback <br />sucker. <br />Other recent articles have also concluded that selenium <br />concentrations in the upper Colorado River basin, which <br />includes the Green River, are elevated sufficiently in water. <br />food organisms, and fish tissue to suggest that selenium is <br />causing adverse effects in razorback sucker and possibly <br />other fish (Hamilton and Waddell, 1994; Waddell and May, <br />1995; Hamilton, 1998; Hamilton et ai., 1996, 2000; Stephens <br />and Waddell, 1998). <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> <br />The authors thank B. Haines (USFWS. Colorado River Fishery Project. <br />Vernal. UT) for light trapping the larval razorback suckers: Dave lrving <br />lUSFWS, CRFP. Vernal, UT) for information on Little Stewart Lake: and <br />John Besser, Jim Fairchild. Kurt Maier. Barb Osmundson. and Doyle <br />Stephens for reviewing the manuscript. <br />