<br />144
<br />
<br />HAMILTON ET AL.
<br />
<br />locations where they were collected by light trapping. On
<br />the other hand, larvae used in the Ouray study (Hamilton et
<br />aI., 1996) were spawned from hatchery-held adults that were
<br />induced to spawn by injection of hormones. Larvae in the
<br />Ouray study came from two spawns, whereas the wild
<br />larvae probably came from several adults that had spawned
<br />under natural conditions. Studies with Pacific salmon (On-
<br />corhynchus sp.) found that wild fish had higher survival rates
<br />than hatchery-reared fish (Felton et al., 1990). Similarly, the
<br />hatchery-spawned larval razorback sucker may have been
<br />less fit to deal with stresses than wild-spawned larvae. Con-
<br />sequently, larvae used in the Ouray study might have been
<br />more sensitive to stressors than wild larvae. Nevertheless,
<br />based on the available literature summarized in Table 4,
<br />whole-body residues measured in wild razorback sucker
<br />larvae were comparable to residues in other species where
<br />adverse effects on survival and growth were observed.
<br />
<br />Other Inorganic Elements in Larvae
<br />
<br />A few inorganic elements seemed elevated in the ICP-MS
<br />scan of the composite sample of larvae from Stewart Lake
<br />Drain. The concentration of cadmium in larvae was
<br />4.9 !J.g/g, which was greater than the maximum concentra-
<br />tion of 0.8 !J.g/g reported in the NCBP (Schmitt and Brum-
<br />baugh, 1990). Values in the NCBP were given as wet weight
<br />tissue concentrations. For comparison purposes, those
<br />values were converted to dry weight concentrations by
<br />assuming 73.8% moisture in whole-body fish tissue, which
<br />was the average for the percentage moisture in 315 fish
<br />samples collected as part of the NCBP (Schmitt and Brum-
<br />baugh, 1990). The concentration of copper in larvae was
<br />40 /lg/g, which was greater than the 85th percentile value of
<br />3.82 /lg/g, but less than the maximum concentration of
<br />88.2 /lg!g in the NCBP. The concentration of lead in larvae
<br />was 3.8 /lg/g, which was greater than the 85th percentile
<br />value of 0.84 /lg/g, but less than the maximum value of
<br />18.6/lg!g in the NCBP. The concentrations of selenium in
<br />larvae were 5.8 and 8.0/lg/g, which were greater than the
<br />85th percentile value of 2.8 !J.g/g and close to the maximum
<br />value of 8.8 /lg!g in the NCBP. The concentration of zinc in
<br />larvae was 299/lg/g, which was greater than the 85th per-
<br />centile value of 1311-lgjg, but less than the maximum value
<br />of 452 /lg!g in the NCBP. The concentration of arsenic in
<br />larvae was not elevated compared to the NCBP data. Mer-
<br />cury and strontium were not measured in the larvae, but
<br />have been reported as inorganic elements of concern in
<br />water, sediment, or biota in the Green River (Stephens et ai.,
<br />1988, 1992; Peltz and Waddell, 1991; Finger et aI., 1994;
<br />Hamilton et aI., 1996).
<br />Mount et aI. (1994) investigated cadmium, copper, lead,
<br />and zinc individually in the diet with 33-day-old rainbow
<br />trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for 60 days. He reported no
<br />effects on survival or growth at residue concentrations in
<br />
<br />fish of 6.8 /lg/g for cadmium, 36 /lgig for copper. 10 /lg g for
<br />lead, and 303 /lg!g for zinc. Each of these concentrations
<br />were close to or greater than the concentrations in larvae for
<br />the present study. Consequently, cadmium, copper, lead. and
<br />zinc residues in the razorback sucker larvae in the present
<br />study may not be elevated to concentrations of concern.
<br />Vanadium concentrations in razorback sucker larvae
<br />(1.7 /lg!g) were close to a residue value of 2.05 \.lg!g present
<br />in rainbow trout that had reduced growth and reduced
<br />feeding response (Hilton and Bettger, 1988). Consequently.
<br />vanadium seems to be the only element, other than sel-
<br />enium, elevated sufficiently in larvae to be of concern.
<br />
<br />CONCLl'S[O~
<br />
<br />The range of selenium in wild razorback sucker larvae in
<br />the present study was as low as 3/lg/g as a whole-body
<br />residue, which suggests that if larvae from adults with low
<br />selenium residues drift to a relatively low selenium area,
<br />they probably will survive to the juvenile life stage. In fact,
<br />this scenario apparently happened at Old Charlie Wash, as
<br />evidenced by the collection of 28 young of year razorback
<br />sucker in 1995 (Modde, 1996) and 45 in 1996 (Modde, 1997).
<br />However, if larvae start out with low selenium residues. as
<br />occurred at Cliff Creek and Stewart Lake Drain, then accu-
<br />mulate selenium through waterborne and dietary exposures
<br />to concentrations greater than the toxic threshold of 4 /lg/g,
<br />there seems little likelihood of their survival to the juvenile
<br />stage. Conversely, larvae with elevated selenium concentra-
<br />tions, such as those at Sportsman's Drain, can reduce their
<br />selenium burden by depuration if larvae can reach a rela-
<br />tively clean nursery area. Nevertheless, the widespread pres-
<br />ence of elevated selenium residues, i.e., >4/lg/g, in larval
<br />razorback sucker from Cliff Creek to Old Charlie Wash
<br />inlet suggests that widespread selenium contamination of
<br />the Green River is occurring and may be adversely affecting
<br />the reproductive success of the endangered razorback
<br />sucker.
<br />Other recent articles have also concluded that selenium
<br />concentrations in the upper Colorado River basin, which
<br />includes the Green River, are elevated sufficiently in water.
<br />food organisms, and fish tissue to suggest that selenium is
<br />causing adverse effects in razorback sucker and possibly
<br />other fish (Hamilton and Waddell, 1994; Waddell and May,
<br />1995; Hamilton, 1998; Hamilton et ai., 1996, 2000; Stephens
<br />and Waddell, 1998).
<br />
<br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
<br />
<br />The authors thank B. Haines (USFWS. Colorado River Fishery Project.
<br />Vernal. UT) for light trapping the larval razorback suckers: Dave lrving
<br />lUSFWS, CRFP. Vernal, UT) for information on Little Stewart Lake: and
<br />John Besser, Jim Fairchild. Kurt Maier. Barb Osmundson. and Doyle
<br />Stephens for reviewing the manuscript.
<br />
|