Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~lI) <br /> <br />l/ ubbs and .ill iller <br /> <br />Three measurements were taken of the depth, but these are to a <br />laqe degree independent expressions, though correlated. The <br />greatest body depth (graph not reproduced) varies with condition as <br />well as size, but the plotted measurements clearly separate the <br />pal ental species, and the hybrids are intermediate. The depth <br />through the insertion of the pectoral fin measures primarily the <br />e1eration of the nuchal hump, which is diagnostic of Xyrauchen and <br />is partly developed in the hybrids (PIs. I and III). The depth of <br />the caudal peduncle differs noticeably in ecological forms, much more <br /> <br />10 20 30 40 <br />120 J--LLJ <br /> <br />DEPTH THROUGH INSERTION <br />OF PECTORAL FIN <br /> <br /> <br />SO <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />thaI I does the greatest body depth. In some of the largest hybrids <br />the depth values approach those of Catostomu,~ latipinni,~, probably <br />beclLuse they are more 01' less emaciated. This emaciation affeds <br />least; the depth through the pectoral insertion, for the hump has a <br />bon.'1 base. In this character there is no overlap between the meas- <br />l~J'eI:1ents for t.he pa~ental species, and the values for the hybrids <br />he very close to the Ime of separation. <br />) n the overall length of the lips-an extremely variable charac- <br />ter, as Rutter (1908, pp. 123-24) pointed out for Catostomus occi- <br />dentalis-the hybrids are intermediate, but six approach C. latipinnis <br /> <br /> <br />Hybridization between Catostomus and Xyrauchen <br /> <br />217 <br /> <br />~ . <br /> <br />much more closely and fall within the upper limit of variation for <br />that parental species. In the basal separation of the lower lips, most <br />of the hybrids come closer to C. latipinnis. Of the six large hybrids, <br />one falls outside of the growth curve for latipinnis, three resemble <br />that species more than they do Xyrauchen texanus, one is almost <br />precisely intermediate, and one comes much nearer to Xyrauchen. <br />In the width of the gape the hybrids are more variable: some speci- <br />mens resemble C. latipinnis and others closely approach X. texanus, <br />while still others are intermediate. Since the lip is longer and the <br />gape is narrower in C. latipinnis, the difference between the parental <br /> <br />IOO"~ <br />I.' x <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />o 0 <br />o "~o 0 x <br />o 0 0 0 <br />o 0 0 000 0 0 <br />o 0 <br /> <br />x <br />x <br />iYoo <br /> <br />GAPE WIDTH <br />LIP LENGTH <br /> <br /><P nO <br />~Cb <br />o 0 <br /> <br />(t.o t <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />FIG. 8. Change with age in the ratio of gape width to lip length (overall length of both <br />lips) in Cafostomus latipinm's (circles) and Xyrauche1! texanus (solid dots), and the <br />ratios of the eight hybrids (crosses). Computed from measurements plotted on <br />l<'igurt' 1. <br /> <br />species is accentuated by expressing the gape width as a p~rcenta~e <br />of the lip length (Fig. 3). In this proportion, as well as m the lip <br />structures, some of the hybrids approach X, texanus; others, C. lati- <br />pinnis. The variation is greater than would be expected within a <br />species. .. . <br />The gill rakers of the smallest hybrid are defimtely mtermedIate <br />in lcngth, as would be expected, since the giIlraker lengths of the <br />parental species differ in the young (Fig. 1). When four additional <br />measurements of Xyrauchen (taken after Fig. 1 was drawn) are <br />added, the distinction of the adults in respect to raker length largely <br />