My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7146
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:09:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7146
Author
Hubbs, C. L. and R. R. Miller
Title
Hybridization in Nature Between the Fish Genera
USFW Year
1953
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Hybridization between Catosfollw.s and Xyrallclwll 'l15 <br /> <br />vary little in proportions throughout its range, the graphs for ~hat <br />genus are based on specimens from all parts of the Colorado Rlv~r <br />system. The data for Catostomus latipinnis were taken from speCI- <br />mens from the upper Colorado River system in Colorado (mostly) <br />and in northern Utah, at and near the places where the hybrids were <br /> <br />TABLE V <br /> <br />MEASUREMENTS OF CATos'rOMUS LATtPINNIS, HYBRIDS, AND XYUAUCHEN TEXAN US <br /> <br />Actual measurements are given for the eight hybrids, along with the average <br />measurements of. the parental species at the same sizes, determined graphically (Figs. <br />1-2). The hybrids and most of the specimens of both parental species were measured <br />by Hubbs; most measurements of the young of Xyrauchen texanus were taken by <br />Miller. We followed the methods recommended by Hubbs and LagleI' (1947 pp. <br />13-15, figs. 2-5). Precision dial calipers were used in measuring the smaller pa;ts. <br /> <br />Measurement <br /> <br />Standard length ........ 101. 7 256 <br /> <br />Dimension, in mm. <br /> <br />385' <br /> <br />186 391 442 <br />-- -.- - <br />6.0 77.0 85.6 <br />8.2 78.0 92.8 <br />1.3 102.5 103.6 <br />.t.8 65.5 74.1 <br />ij.7 70.0 78.3 <br />'7.5 88.6 100.0 <br />7.4 27.7 31.4 <br />L.9 29.6 33.7 <br />1.9 34.3 38.7 <br />r .3 38.0 45.0 <br />1.4 3.1. B 33.2 <br />),2 20.6 24.4 <br />..5 19.8 23.3 <br />1.4 22,4 24.9 <br />.8 25.3 29.2 <br />..81 1.82 2.1 <br />.46 2.65 . 2.56 <br />i.62 6.75 8.1 <br />,.76 5.90 6.69 <br />.04 6.UO 7.54 <br />;.28 6.38 7.2 <br />1.2 68.9 77.8 <br />.1 74.7 87.2 <br />1.1 81.9 91.0 <br />.'.0 17.3 .. . t <br />1.7 13. ~l . .. <br />1.5 18.75 .. . <br />52 52 52 <br />70 64 75 <br />23 128 120 <br /> <br />collected. The actual measurements of the hybrids are plotted on <br />the same graphs. The growth lines for the parental species were <br />drawn by inspection. Several types of curves} some not readily <br />subject to conventional analysis through logarithmic transformations, <br />are obviously represented. <br /> <br />Body depth <br />C. latipinnis. ......... 22.0 <br />Hy brid .............. 24.7 <br />X.texanus ...........28.6 <br />Depth through pectoral in- <br />sertion <br />C. latipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanua ........... <br />Caudal-peduncle depth <br />C. latipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanus ........... <br />Lips, overnlllcngth (A)* <br />C. llliipinnia. . . . . . . . . . <br />lTybrid .............. <br />X. ieXllnllS ........... <br />Gape width (B) <br />C. llltipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanlls ........... <br />Separation, lower lipst <br />C. latipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanus ........... <br />Gillraker, length of longest <br />C. latipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanU8 ........... <br />Dorsal fin, length of base <br />C. latipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanus ........... <br />Interpelvic space <br />C. latipinnis. . . . . . . . . . <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanU8 " . . . . .. . . . <br />Ratio, B/ A (Fig, 8) <br />C.latipinnis. ......... <br />Hybrid .............. <br />X. texanus ............ <br /> <br />53.0 <br />61.3 <br />70.7 <br /> <br />379 <br /> <br />384 <br /> <br /> <br />64.4 64.6 <br />71.7 71.4 <br />87.0 87.2 <br />27.2 27.3 <br />30.1 30.3 <br />33.7 33.8 <br />37.0 87.2 <br />32.2 31.7 <br />20.0 20.1 <br />19.4 19.5 <br />23.8 19.2 <br />24.6 24.7 <br />1.80 1.81 <br />2.55 8.63 <br />6.58 6.60 <br /> <br />5.74 <br />5.80 <br />6.24 <br /> <br />67.8 <br />73.1 <br />80.7 <br /> <br />16.9 <br />14.1 <br />18.4 <br /> <br />52 <br />74 <br />123 <br /> <br />-9 <br /> <br />75.0 75.7 75.8 7 <br />92.3 82.5 87.5 8 <br />99.7 100.7 101.0 10 <br /> <br />-8 <br /> <br />214 <br /> <br />LENGTH OF <br />7- LONGEST <br /> <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br /> <br />2' <br />3 <br />3: <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />17.3 43.8 63.6 <br />19.9 47.65 77.8 <br />22.5 57.7 85.8 <br />6.65 17.8 26.9 <br />8.2 20.3 28.9 <br />9.1 22.7 33.3 <br />7.1 21.7 36.8 <br />6.4 18.6 28.4 <br />5.2 12.4 19.7 <br />4.9 12.2 19.1 <br />6.0 13.15 19.7 <br />6.1 15.2 24.2 <br />0.46 1.16 1.77 <br />0.54 ~.80 4.75 <br />1.14 3.80 6.44 <br />1.26 3.56 5.66 <br />1.42 3.66 5.75 <br />1.69 4.33 6.16 <br />18.8 45.6 67.0 <br />22.2 54.3 78.1 <br />26.1 57.1 79.8 <br />2.6 9.3 16.5 <br />3.2 12.45 12.8 <br />4.1 11.8 18.1 <br />69 56 53 <br />94 71 84 <br />117 123 122 <br /> <br />3' <br />3: <br />2( <br /> <br />--4--- <br /> <br />19 <br />2: <br />24 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />( <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />f' <br /> <br />FIG. 1. Relative growth of four parts in Catostomlls latipinnis (circles) and Xyrauchen <br />texanus (solid dots) and corresponding measurements of the eight hybrids (crosses). <br />The specimens of C. latipinnis came from the upper Colorado River system in <br />Colorado (mostly) and northern Utah at or near the places where the hybrids <br />were obtained. Those of X. texanus are from all parts of the range of the species. <br />The measurements were made by Hubbs. The growth curves were drawn from <br />inspection. Measurements of four additional specimens of X. texanU8 from the <br />Colorado River Mesa County, Colorado (U.S.N.M., Nos. 132468 and 132469), <br />made after Fi~res 1 and 2 were prepared, confirm essentially the position of the <br />lines for that species at lengths of 320 to 398 mm., except for the length of the <br />longest gillraker (as noted in the text). <br /> <br />5.76 <br />6.60 <br />6.!W <br /> <br />68.0 <br />81.6 <br />81.0 <br /> <br />7 <br />( <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />6f <br />77 <br />8 <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />1 <br /> <br />17.0 <br />20.8 <br />18.5 <br /> <br />52 <br />61 <br />123 <br /> <br />* Distance from front of upper lip to line joining posterior tips of lobes of lower <br />lip. <br />t Least distance between papillae at extreme base of lobes of lower lip, but dis- <br />regarding papillae at isthmus that clearly arise between the lobes. <br />t Values not entered, since at this length the parental species seem not to differ <br />in this character. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.