My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8011
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:09:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8011
Author
Hood, L. C., et al.
Title
Frayed Safety Nets, Conservation Planning Under the Endangered Species Act 1998.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Washington D.C.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,......................................................................................................................................................................... F RAY E 0 SA <br /> F E T Y NET S <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />the Colorado River. <br />Preserve management must also address "edge <br />effects" that can adversely affect communities on <br />the edge of preserves, such as increased wind at <br />the edge of forests, nest parasitism by cowbirds <br />that lay eggs in birds' nests located close to the <br />forest edge, predation by such opportunistic <br />predators as raccoons (Procyon lotor) and <br />domestic cars, increased human presence, and <br />exotic species invasion. These factors (among <br />others) can have significant negative impacts on <br />species dependent upon interior habitats. <br />Conservation plans must contain monitoring of <br />potential edge effects, management prescriptions <br />to ameliorate such effects, and preserve design <br />that delineates adjacent land use and buffer areas. <br />Of the conservation plans analyzed here, the <br />MSCP in San Diego County will be affected <br />most by edge effects. This plan creates a preserve <br />system while allowing development outside the <br />preserve areas and allowing some infrastructure <br />development within the preserves. The plan <br />acknowledges that under this scenario, edge <br />effects are potentially severe. If the MSCP is <br />implemented as intended and funding is suffi- <br />cient, each preserve tract will have a habitat man- <br />agement plan, which will delineate habitat <br />buffers and specifY measures that managers will <br />take to minimize edge effects. Building new <br />roads in preserved areas is likely to be very diffi- <br />cult in the MSCP because any such project <br />would require a major amendment to the plan (a <br />process requiring FWS approval). Moreover, a <br />highly controversial expansion of Route 56 in <br />San Diego County will be completed so that it <br />does not run through sensitive habitat identified <br /> <br />in the MSCP planning efforts. In addition, the <br />biological monitoring plan emphasizes detection <br />of changes in habitat quality over time, especial- <br />ly edge effects. Dr. Ted Case at the University of <br />California, San Diego, has proposed an institute <br />that would bring researchers together to perform <br />studies of these increasingly isolated habitat pre- <br />serves. While this institute is not part of the <br />MSCP per se, the emergent studies would be <br />peer-reviewed and published in scientific jour- <br />nals, and the researchers would communicate <br />their results to local management agencies and <br />the broader scientific community. <br /> <br />Adaptive Management <br /> <br />Management plans should be put into place <br />immediately after preserves are established, but <br />there must also be a method to change manage- <br />ment techniques according to changing condi- <br />tions. Any science-based conservation plan must <br />incorporate techniques of adaptive management, <br />whereby experimental approaches to manage- <br />ment are monitored and changed with informa- <br />tion generated by those experiments (Walters <br />1986). Plans must also contain the capability for <br />changes in management that take into account <br />new monitoring information, ecological knowl- <br />edge, and/or changing environmental conditions. <br />Decisions regarding management in conservation <br />plans, to be effective, must be explicitly tied to <br />monitoring and biological goals of the plan <br />(Murphy et al. 1997). <br />There are several reasons why conservation <br />plans must include provisions for incorporating <br />changes in management. The plan may have <br />unpredicted consequences for the species; or new <br /> <br />.... ... ... ... .......... .... ... ......... ... ................ .............. ........................ ... ....... ............... ... ... ....................................................... <br />......................................... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.