My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7162
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7162
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:08:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7162
Author
Harper, K. C. and H. M. Tyus
Title
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's White River Fishes Study
USFW Year
1982
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the Bonneville Ch. of the AFS
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r 'c- <br />I <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />< <br /> <br />The White River arises in the Flattop Mountains of western <br />Colorado and flows uninterrupted for 402 km before joining the <br />Green River at Ouray, Utah. The study area (Figure 1) included <br />241 km of the White River and extended from the confluence of the <br />White and Green rivers near Ouray, Utah to Rio Blanco Lake, an off- <br />stream reservoir in Colorado. The White River rises from 1421 m <br />above mean sea level (MSL) at its mouth to an elevation of 1723 m <br />MSL at Rio Blanco Lake. The upper portion of the study area is <br />bordered by agricultural land comprised of alfalfa fields, permanent <br />pastures, and grain and corn crops. The lower portion is largely <br />undeveloped, but some insults occur to the White River because of <br />energy development, and several water development projects are <br />planned. <br /> <br />MATERIALS AND METHODS <br /> <br />A standardized sampling program was developed. Five "homo- <br />geneous" river sections 28-61 km in length were identified by <br />evaluating the fishery habitat. These sections included canyons, <br />low gradient braided sections and a high gradient, relatively clean <br />water section. The five homogeneous sections (V, W, X, Y and Z) <br />were treated as discrete strata (Figure 1), so that samples could <br />be representative of all habitats and overall sampling variability <br />would be reduced. <br /> <br />Sampling procedures were similar to those presented by Archer <br />et al. (1980). Sample sites within the stratum were selected by <br />river miles from a table of random digits, for Strata V, W, X, Y <br />and Z. All habitat types within a 0.8 km sample station were then <br />sampled for 24 hours with trammel nets (46 x 1.8 m; 2.9 cm mesh, <br />25.4 cm wall), seines (4 m x 1.8 m; 6.3 mm mesh; double hung lead <br />line), electrofishinggear (DC variable voltage pulsator with a <br />240 w generator) and wire traps (0.45 m diameter 0.77 m long, <br />25.4 rom mesh). <br /> <br /> <br />After the 0.8 km station was sampled, electrofishing was <br />continued downstream for 7.2 km. At that location a second station <br />(0.8 km) was established, and all of the habitat types within the <br />second 0.8 km were sampled for another 24 hours. An exception to <br />the s~p1ing procedures was necessary for Stratum V since it was <br />only 29 km in length. Electrofishing effort was reduced by one-half, <br />and continued only 3.1 km downstream before the second 0.8 km <br />section was sampled. <br /> <br />Methods used in the radiotelemetry study of Colorado squaw- <br />fish were presented in Tyus et al. (1981). The larval sampling <br />procedures are given in the White River Report (Tyus and Harper <br />1982) but not repeated here since the data have not been completely <br />analyzed. <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />...... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.