Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SIMULATING IRRIGATION WATER TOXICITY 53 <br /> <br />TABLE II. Quality control and quality assurance measures for the analysis of water (J1g/U <br />and fish (J1g/g) <br /> <br /> Inorganic and matrix <br /> Copper Selenium Zinc <br />Species and measure Water Fish Water Fish Water Fish <br />Razorback sucker <br />LOO" 0.8 0.1 2.9 0.03 0.9 9.5 <br />BECb < < < < < < <br />RSOc (%) 3.6 5.2 4.5 5.8 4.8 5.1 <br />Digestion spiked (%) NSf g 116 104 NS 102 <br />Spiked samplee (%) 102 103 104 89 103 87 <br />Bonytail <br />LOO 1.2 0.3 3.2 0.03 0.8 8.4 <br />BEC < < < < < < <br />RSO (%) 3.6 7.5 4.6 5.0 4.0 2.6 <br />Digestion spike (%) NS 90 106 NS 107 <br />Spiked sample (%) 102 99 91 95 101 104 <br /> <br />a LOD: limit of detection. <br />b BEC: background equivalent concentration: < less than LOD; > greater than LOD. <br />e RSD: relative standard deviation for triplicate sample preparation and analysis. <br />d Digestion spike: percent recovery of element spiked in a sample prior to digestion. <br />e Spiked sample: percent recovery of element spiked in a sample after digestion and prior to analysis. <br />f NS: water samples analyzed for copper and zinc were measured directly with graphite furnace and did not <br />incorporate digestion of samples. <br />g Concentration of prepared digestion spike too low for measurement. <br /> <br />were within the recommended range. Except where <br />noted, residue concentrations in tissues and diet were <br />expressed on a dry weight basis. <br /> <br />Statistical Analysis <br /> <br />Toxicant effects on percent survival (arcsine-trans- <br />formed values), growth, whole-body concentrations of <br />copper, selenium, and zinc (logarithmically transformed <br />values), fish behavioral activity (square root trans- <br />formed), and swimming performance of fish in expo- <br />sure treatments and controls were compared by one-way <br />analysis of variance. Treatment means were compared <br />by the Bonferroni (Dunn) multiple-means comparison <br />test (Snedecor and Cochran, 1967). In statistical analy- <br />ses, individual growth chambers or replicate aquaria <br />were the experimental unit because biological mea- <br />surements were made on different fish within replicate <br />growth chambers or aquaria. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Eggs of razorback sucker contained 2.8 p,g/g selenium <br />(assuming 75% moisture; analyzed as 0.69 p,g/g wet <br />weight), whereas bonytail eggs contained 2.2 p,g/g <br />(assuming 75% moisture; analyzed as 0.56 p,g/g wet <br />weight). The commercial fish food, Biodiet, used in the <br /> <br />two studies contained 11-28 p,g/ g copper, 1.7-2.0 <br />p,g/g selenium, and 93-169 p,g/g zinc. Brine shrimp <br />contained 2.7 p,g/g selenium. Dissolved oxygen con- <br />centrations in the razorback sucker study averaged 6.5 <br />mg/L and in the bonytail study averaged 6.4 mg/L. <br />Concentrations of copper, selenium, and zinc in expo- <br />sure water were close to nominal concentrations (Table <br />III). <br />Survival of razorback sucker larvae was reduced <br />after 60 and 90 days of exposure in the 8X and 16X <br />treatments (Table IV). In bony tail, survival was re- <br />duced only in the 16X treatment, but it occurred ear- <br />lier than with razorback sucker at 30 days of exposure. <br />Growth, measured as total length and weight, of <br />razorback sucker was reduced in a concentration-re- <br />sponse manner as early as 30 days of exposure in the <br />2X-16X treatments, but after 90 days of exposure <br />reduced growth was observed in the 4X and higher <br />treatments (Table V). Condition factor was reduced in <br />the IX (environmental concentration) treatment at 30 <br />and 60 days of exposure, but persisted only in the 4X <br />and 8X treatments at 90 days of exposure. Reductions <br />in growth at 90 days of exposure were largest for <br />weight; weight of fish in the 4X treatment was reduced <br />by 34% and in the 8X treatment by 92% compared to <br />fish in the control treatment, whereas total length of <br />fish in the 4X treatment was reduced by 13% and in <br />the 8X treatment by 51 % compared to control fish. <br />