Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NEST-SPECIFIC BASS DNA FINGERPRINTS <br /> <br />453 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />61 kb- <br /> .. ~ . ... ... ~-,:,,;,-.........d tiLl ... . . <br /> r . 1 ... f . -- <br /> ..' <br /> IJ '" . . --- . . ~ . <br /> . .. . ...~ . .- . <br />30 kb - <br /> <br /> <br />16kb- <br /> <br />FIGURE 3,- The DNA fingerprints of seven small mouth bass fry collected from nest C32 in Lake Opeongo (probe <br />[GGA TJ4 and enzyme Hae III), <br /> <br />vidual to its nest of origin and assess if nest-spe- <br />cific fingerprints exist. Eight fry that had not been <br />fingerprinted previously were chosen by a second <br />party and their vials were arbitrarily relabeled; the <br />second party kept a hidden list of the nest of origin <br />of each vial. Fingerprints were generated for all <br />fry and their banding patterns (distribution and <br />intensity of bands) were compared visually to each <br />of the 15 nest fingerprints to assign a nest of origin, <br />A match was determined when the banding pat- <br />tern of a fry concurred with the overall banding <br />pattern of a particular nest fingerprint. Assign- <br />ments were compared with the list of actual nest <br />origins for an assessment of the ability of this tech- <br />nique to correctly identify nest origin, <br /> <br />Results <br />The best DNA fingerprint patterns were ob- <br />tained with the restriction enzyme Hae III and the <br />oligonucleotide probe (GACAk Compared with <br />the other combinations of enzymes and probes, <br /> <br />the banding pattern generated by Hae III and <br />(GACA)4 consisted ofa moderate number of bands <br />per individual (36 i: 4, mean i: SD) that migrated <br />throughout the 1.6-14-kb range (Figure 2), This <br />combination of enzyme and probe produced a low <br />level of polymorphic loci across members within <br />a nest, as was evident from the average SI of87,2 <br />:t 4.4 (Table I), Similar levels of polymorphism <br /> <br />TABLE I.-Average similarity indices of DNA finger- <br />prints and numbers of comparisons between individual <br />smallmouth bass for three categories of fry or guardian <br />males, Spatial rela1ionships of individual nests and clus- <br />ters of nes'ts are shown in Figure \, <br /> <br />Comparisons between <br /> <br />Fry within a nest <br />Fry from several nests closely <br />spaced together in clusters <br />Fry or guardian males from <br />different nests within Jones Bay <br /> <br />Number Similarity <br />of com- index <br />pansons (mean :t SO) <br />62 87,2 :t 4.4 <br />13 67,2 :t 6,0 <br />15 52,5 :t 5,8 <br />