Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B. Quarrv Study Site <br /> <br />The Quarry study site is located between RM 307.6 and 308.5 and <br />morphologically represents sub-segment B from RM 294.8 to 309.8 of segment 3, <br />from Spring Hollow, upstream to approximately 0.8 of a mile above Red Wash. <br />Sub-segment B exhibits the broadest flood plan anywhere on the Green River <br />(Rose 1987). It is straight to mildly meandering with a low gradient. There <br />are some wooded bottoms and a lot of adjacent agricultural development. There <br />are 'several islands within the reach. The slope of the stream equals 0.00027 <br />(Rose 1987; Figure 9). <br /> <br />The channel stability of the Green River from RM 237 to 310 is presently in <br />adjustment to its sediment load and current discharge patterns (Lyons, 1989; <br />Pucherelli, 1988). A channel size increase of two percent during the high <br />flow years of the early 1980's suggests potential for future changes within <br />the realm of equilibrium. According to Lyons (1988), such changes are short <br />term adjustments in the equilibrium of a stream (occurring and persisting on <br />the order of 1 - 10 years). <br /> <br />1. Field Measurements <br /> <br />Field data collection for channel geometry and hydraulics was completed <br />throughout the 1986 and 1987 summer field seasons. On July 31, 1986, a site <br />map was drawn and three transects identified and surveyed. The transects <br />during the 1986 summer field season were only used for sediment sample <br />collections. In may of 1987, four additional transects were added to the <br />Quarry site as it was developed for PHABSIM use. On May 5, the depth and <br />velocity distributions for each transect were recorded at a flow of <br />10,736 cfs. On May 7th and 29th, July 9th, and August 11th, additional WSE's <br />were collected at each transect at flows of 9058, 5364, 2538 and 1081 cfs, <br />respectively. On August 11, during low flow conditions, the stream was waded <br />where possible at each transect to evaluate the predominant and surrounding <br />substrate particle sizes. In sections of the transect too deep to wade, an <br />oar was lowered from the front of the boat to estimate substrate types. <br />Distances between transects were measured along the water's edge for both <br />banks and a plot of the longitudinal profile prepared. <br /> <br />The river at this site is generally troughlike and characterized by runs, <br />eddies, backwaters and large sandbars (Table 18). Although, the channel is <br />considered stable, the sandbars shift location in the stream with changes in <br />discharge. Sand is the most common substrate with cobble along the river <br />edges. <br /> <br />2. Model Calibration <br /> <br />The output from the WSEI4S program gives an estimated WSE and discharge for <br />each transect at measured flows (Tables 19 and 20). In this analysis, ratios <br />between measured and predicted discharges range from 0.90 to 1.12 for <br /> <br />28 <br />