Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 17. A periodic chart of the optimal flow and approximate flow ranges <br />which will maintain 90 percent of the weighted-useable-area for <br />adult and depositional life stages of Colorado squawfish and adult <br />razorback suckers. <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />JanFebMarADrMaYJunJulAuQSeoOctNovDec <br /> <br />Jan <br /> <br />Dec <br /> <br />1500 ( 500-2700) Colorado squawfish: Adult <br /> <br />Mid-Jun SeD <br />4200 (2200-5600)' <br />Colorado squawfish: Deposition <br /> <br />May Jun <br />5600 (1600-7700) <br />Razorback sucker: Adult <br /> <br />Jul Nov <br />1900 (1400-2700) <br />Razorback sucker: Adult <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED FLOW <br /> <br />Jan <br /> <br />May Mid-Jun Jul <br /> <br />SeD Oct <br /> <br />Dec <br /> <br />1700------------------ 2700 2200-------------------- 1700--------- <br /> <br />Mean monthly flows from 1930 to 1982 <br />JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC <br />2546 3000 2415 5519 9653 8776 3777 1934 1495 2360 2566 2607 <br /> <br />predict that habitat is maximized at flows that are quite low relative to the <br />range of historic flows. From November to April a flow of 1700 cfs is only 55 <br />percent of the average historical flow during this time period (3109 cfs). <br />The flow for May (2700 cfs) is only 30 percent of the mean historical flow <br />(9653 cfs). Similarly in June and July, a 2200 cfs flow is only 35 percent of <br />the historical monthly mean (6276.5). According to Tyus, Jones and Trinca <br />(1987) optimum Colorado squawfish spawning and initiation of migration <br />occurred between 2820 and 13100 cfs, with mean values ranging from 4400 to <br />8797 cfs. They also estimated that elevated flows during the primary nursery <br />period (August to September) were detrimental to larval survival and that a <br />flow between 1931 and 2338 cfs would optimize young-of-year habitat. <br /> <br />Further studies must be made to help verify these results. They are <br />surprisingly low flow recommendations and don't agree with previous research <br />results such that one tends to question their validity. Future experiments to <br />include the modeling of a greater variety of life stages which tend to <br />dominate in eddy and backwater areas may provide a more complete picture. <br /> <br />27 <br />