Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />at a given shear stress many different particle sizes may be at incipient motion. <br /> <br />in a gravel bed channel the range of shear stresses necessary for incipient motion <br />of a broad range of particle sizes is small, and the concept of equal mobility for <br />all grain sizes may be appropriate. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Under certain flow conditions, large particles may be mobile under a smaller discharge, <br />and then become relatively immobile at a higher discharge. This apparent anomaly is <br />based on a well documented principle of fluid mechanics related to a reduction in drag <br />with a change in the boundary layer condition. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Flushing of fme sediment from a gravel bed, without disruption of the armor layer, is <br />limited to about one median cobble particle diameter. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />The empirical Andrews relationship is recommended for quantifying incipient motion of <br />the bed layer itself in the Yampa River, providing conditions discussed in conclusion 3 do <br />not exist. These results should be compared to the analytical procedure by Wiberg and <br />Smith. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />The observations of Milhous and the empirical equations of Everts and those of Fisher, <br />Sills and Clark should be used to evaluate flushing flow incipient motion, recognizing that <br />more research will be required before this condition can be predicted with confidence. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />The occurrence of fine material at depth in the gravel bed is a natural condition in the <br />Yampa River. <br /> <br />2-7 <br />