My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9568
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9568
Author
Resource Consultants Inc.
Title
Sediment Transport Studies of the Little Snake, Yampa, and Green River Systems.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Based on the incipient motion literature review it is concluded that the Parker type empirical <br />relationship (eg. Parker et al. 1982, Andrews 1983, and Diplas 1987) best describes the critical <br />dimensionless shear stress for armor layer stability in gravel bed systems. Results from this type of <br />relationship are consistent with field and laboratory observations and theoretical derivations, specifically <br />that a range of particle sizes can be put in motion at a given discharge. Further, the estimated values of <br />dimensionless critical shear stress resulting from the Parker type formulations are within the range <br />reported by various investigators. <br /> <br />Parameter values determined for this type of relationship by various investigators do not vary <br />dramatically. Therefore, the equation utilized may not be critical; however, considering that Andrews' <br />results were based on channels in the Rocky Mountain region it seems most appropriate to utilize his <br />parameter values for analysis of the Yampa River. <br /> <br />The results from this empirically based procedure for predicting critical dimensionless shear stress <br />may be compared with the analytically derived procedure described by Wiberg and Smith (1987), providing <br />the physical conditions are within the range of assumptions used in derivation. The only recommended <br />modification in application of these procedures is to check the magnitude of the particle Reynolds number. <br />If it exceeds 100,000, then the results should be carefully evaluated based on the results of Wang and Shen, <br />as discussed above. <br /> <br />If deposition of silt-size particles (wash load) is independent of velocity, one would expect that a <br />gravel bed channel with significant wash load will contain fine material at depth in the gravel bed regardless <br />of flow velocity maintained. Given that the wash load of the Yampa River is about 35 percent of the <br />sediment load, it can be concluded that occurrence of fine sediment at depth in the cobble spawning <br />reaches is a natural condition of the channel. <br /> <br />Based on available research it is reasonable to conclude that flushing of fine sediments from the <br />Yampa River gravel bed reaches without disrupting the surface layer can occur up to a depth equal to the <br />median cobble particle diameter. However, the available literature does not provide a proven method for <br />defining the critical dimensionless shear stress for flushing to occur. The empirical observations by <br />Milhous in Oak Creek, and the empirical relations by Everts and those by Fisher, Sill and Clark are the <br />only alternatives available. None of these approaches are expected to provide defmitive results to Yampa <br />Canyon conditions, illustrating the need for additional research (see Sections 7.3 and 7.4 .. proposals were <br />submitted to the Recovery Implementation Program for Fiscal Years 1991 and 1992 to conduct flume <br />studies to address this issue). <br /> <br />In summary, the following comments and conclusions can be made based on a comprehensive <br />review of incipient motion and flushing flow literature, and application of these concepts to the Yampa <br />River: <br /> <br />1. When considering incipient motion conditions, it is more appropriate to use the concept of <br />no motion of practical significance, rather than zero motion, and recognize that there is <br />always some movement occurring on the channel bed. <br /> <br />2 In a gravel bed system with a coarse bed layer two distinct incipient motion conditions <br />exist: the incipient motion of the bed layer itself, resulting in disruption of the bed <br />surface, and the incipient motion of the small particles deposited in the coarse bed, near <br />the surface, that can occur without disruption of the bed surface (i.e. flushing). <br /> <br />3. In a gravel bed channel the effects of hiding and protrusion can significantly influence <br />incipient motion conditions. As a result of these effects the following conditions may exist: <br /> <br />a given particle size may be entrained at different shear stresses (i.e., a singular <br />relation between particle size and shear stress, as given by the Shields curve, may <br /> <br />2-6 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.