Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Final Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070. Amendment 3 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />time. There was little change in average bed elevation in the downstream pan of the study reach (Fig. 20). Adjustments <br /> <br />of the topography of the upstream compound bar caused by the 1994 flood resulted in a slight decrease in the average <br /> <br />elevation of the entire bed. Elsewhere, average bed elevations after the 1994 flood were more similar to those that had <br /> <br />existed prior to passage of the 1993 flood (Fig. 20). <br /> <br />Geomorphic Characteristics and Changes in the <br />lO-km Study Reach <br /> <br />Fourteen sites in the lO-km study reach were consistently occupied by bank-attached compound bars or point <br /> <br />bars during the study period (Appendix D). In addition to these spatially stable bars, there were many transitory mid- <br /> <br />channel bars. The channel deposits were associated with 10 bank-attached compound bars, most with some stabilizing <br /> <br />vegetation. 3 point bars, and a deposit upstream from a flood return channel that was active only during high flows (Fig. <br /> <br />12). The low flow morphology of these deposits varied greatly from year to year, but the location of these deposits <br /> <br />changed little during this study. Mayers (1995, pers. comm.) states that location of these deposits has changed little <br /> <br />since 1966. <br /> <br />In 1992, during summer low flow, the channel in the lO-km reach had many bank-attached and mid-channel <br /> <br />bars. These conditions were similar to the conditions in the 1.5-km reach. In July 1992, there were 9 mid-channel bars, <br /> <br />and 4 bank-attached bars dissected by one or more chute channels (Appendix D). The channel form was complex and <br /> <br />had many flow-dissecting features. The September 1992 videos were made during a period of lower discharge than the <br /> <br />other video flights (Table 4). The September videos show that the lateral extent of bars visible in the July 1992 videos <br /> <br />(46 m3fs) appeared to have increased, but there was no change in their location. This indicates that visible changes in <br /> <br />morphology were probably an artifact of the lower discharge at the time of the September 1992 Reclamation overflight <br /> <br />After the 1993 spring flood, the number of mid-channel bars and deposits dissected by chute channels at low <br /> <br />flow was reduced from 14 to 3; 2 of these were associated with dissected bank-attached bars. This, and maps of the <br /> <br />reach (Appendix D), demonstrate the simplification of channel morphology from its more complex condition prior to the <br /> <br />1993 flood. Mid-channel deposits were removed and bank-attached compound bars or point bars were consolidated into <br /> <br />single bank-attached units such as occurred within the 1.5-km study reach (Appendix D). <br /> <br />The winter low flows of 1993-1994 increased the number of mid-channel bars to 18 by April 1994. Deposits <br /> <br />were emergent at55.5 m3fs in 8 mid-channel locations whereas no deposits were emergent at 51 m3fs in September <br />