Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- <br /> <br />Draft Final Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />Sediments were rearranged by 1993 - 1994 overwinter flows. A mid-channel bar was emergent between <br />cross-sections 11 and 12, and a low-elevation bar was emergent near the bank-attached bar margin above cross-section <br />7 during the March 1994 survey. <br /> <br /> <br />During passage of the 1994 snowmelt flood, the thalweg between cross-section 4 and 8, inclusive, filled 1 to 2 <br /> <br /> <br />m during the ascending limb and subsequently scoured on the descending limb. After flood passage, the thalweg filled <br /> <br /> <br />to approximately the same elevation as had existed on November 20. 1993. The most downstream portions of the point <br /> <br /> <br />bar (cross-sections 1 to 3) scoured throughout the passage of the 1994 flood. The upstream part of the point bar <br /> <br /> <br />(between cross-sections 4 and 6) had approximately 05 m of fill. <br /> <br />Sediment bud2et within the 15-Ion reach <br />The average bed elevation was calculated at each cross-section and for the entire 15-Ion reach. The reach- <br />averaged bed-elevation change was calculated using the average cross-section bed elevation weighted by the area of <br />channel it represents (see Appendix A for calculation method). The weighting of cross-section bed elevation included <br />the effects of uneven cross-section spacing and variation of channel width; thus, the resultant reach-average bed <br />elevation indicated the change in sediment volume in the 15-Ion reach. The average bed elevation of the 15-Ion reach <br />increased 0.15 m for the period between November 1992 and October 1994. Net reach scale aggradation primarily <br />occurred during the 1993 flood and to a lesser degree during the 1994 flood (Figure 18). <br />Examination of the spatial distribution of the sediment on the bed and bars was more illuminating. Figure 19 <br />shows the longitudinal distribution of the average elevation of the channel bed at.three different times. Average <br />elevation of the bed increased in the upstream end of the study reach because the bank-attached bar occupied most of the <br />channel. <br /> <br />Just as the average bed elevation did not constantly decrease through the reach because of the existence of <br />pools and shallows (Fig. 19), sediment storage within the reach was unevenly distributed (Fig. 20). The change in <br /> <br /> <br />sediment storage was calculated by multiplying each cross section's change in bed elevation by the area that cross <br /> <br />section represented (Appendix A). While figure 19 shows the calculated bed elevation at each cross section. figure 20 <br /> <br /> <br />shows changes in sediment storage relative to a baseline (August 1993) and thereby accounts for the downstream <br /> <br />changes in width and cross-section spacing. The 1993 flood resulted in increased sediment storage in the upstream part <br /> <br />of the reach, and this was entirely due to aggradation of the compound bar, because the thalweg scoured at the same <br />