Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Final Completion Report [0 UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />deposited on the river left side of the secondary channel at the downstream end of the bar. <br />The bank-attached bar became emergent between the June 22 and August 15 surveys. During this period, only <br />small changes in morphology were measured on the top of the bank-attached bar. The thalweg filled at all cross-sections <br />within this subreach. The bar shoulders, which are the submerged bars between the emergent point or bank-attached <br />bar and the thalweg, were eroded throughout the reach. <br />During the base flow period of summer and fall 1993, the thalweg in the study reach continued to fill and <br />erosion occurred on the bar shoulders. The bank-attached bar was reduced by 0.1 to 0.2 m during this period at cross- <br />section 8 (Appendix C), possibly by the high winds observed during this period and which are common (Andrews and <br />Nelson. 1989). <br /> <br />1993 Emer2ent bar form <br />After flood recession. the eri1ergent bar was very different in form from the previous year. The net aggradation <br />of tte bar measured during the 1993 field season was approximately 0.5 m in the secondary channel, and between 0.5 <br />and 1.0 m on the surface of the bar platform. The chute channels that formerly had crossed the upstream portion of the <br />bar in 1992 no longer existed. Although the vegetated area upstream of cross-section 8 scoured sufficiently to remove <br />existing vegetation (compare Fig. 8 and Fig. 17a), the saltcedar and willows were not removed from the downstream <br />vegetated area just upstream from cross-section 7. The area of the bar above 95.0 m increased from 0 to 3540 m2. <br />Krider (1994) analyzed the sedimentary structures of the newly aggraded bar. He showed that the bar platform <br />and secondary channel aggraded at least 0.3 m, with aggradation occurring by deposition of low-amplitude (0.1 to 0.2 <br />m) migrating dunes at high flows, and by deposition of climbing ripples during the descending limb of the hydrograph. <br />The downstream and lateral increases in bar extent were accommodated by the advance of slipfaces. These slipfaces <br />had heights up to 1 m in some locations and were formed with sediment supplied from downstream-migrating dunes on <br />the bar platform. <br /> <br />1994 - O:mnel cross-section measurements <br /> <br />Overwinter flows eroded the downstream end of the bar (near cross-section 7), and small mid-channel bars <br /> <br />became emergent near cross-sections 7 and 10. The location of the thalweg migrated from river left to the bar margin in <br /> <br /> <br />the vicinity of cross-sections 9 and 10 during this period. <br />