Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Final Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />Other features of the bank -attached bar during 1993 and 1994 included isolated pools formed by horseshoe vortices at <br /> <br />the head of the stable vegetated island between cross-sections 10 and 11, a deep pool within the secondary channel <br /> <br />between cross-sections 8 and 9, and superimposed bars along the margin of the bank -attached compound bar (Fig. 16). <br /> <br />The elevation. shape, and topographic organization of the bank-attached compound bar within the l.5-1an study <br /> <br />reach changed from year to year. Cross-section surveys and data inferred from the digitized detailed bar topography and <br /> <br />video prints were used to measure small- and large-scale bar changes. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The bar was surveyed in November 1992 and video images were obtained in 'uly and September 1992. These <br /> <br />data depict the general setting of the bar prior to onset of the spring 1993 snowmelt flood. The September 1992 video <br /> <br />image shows that the bar was more intricately dissected by chute channels, and there were three emergent features at a <br /> <br />low discharge of 35 m3fs (Figure 8). The largest emergent area included a vegetated island, was attached to the bank. <br /> <br /> <br />and occurred at the upstream end of the compound bar. White sand and vegetation. shown to indicate deposits greater <br /> <br />than 94.0 m in elevation determined by subsequent cross-section surveys, also occurred on the downstream emergent <br /> <br />feature. Chute channel flow entered the secondary channel and the secondary channel was not an area of stagnant flow <br /> <br />this discharge. In November 1992, all surveyed cross-section points on the bar were lower than 94.5 In. and the overall <br /> <br /> <br />bar platform was lower in elevation than in subsequent years. <br /> <br />1993 - n"lnnpJ. cross-section measurements <br /> <br />Substantial aggradation of the bank-attached compound bar occurred during the 1993 flood. Maximum flood <br />stage was 1.5 m higher than the highest parts of the bar as surveyed in November 1992. A smooth-edged, <br />high-elevation compound bar became emergent after flood recession (Fig. 16). By June 10, immediately after passage of <br />the flood peak but before bar emergence, the bank-attached bar and its secondary channel had aggraded 0.6 m in most <br />locations and the thalweg had scoured about 1 m.. The chute channels on the bar accumulated up to 1.7 m of sediment <br />Between June 10 and 22, rain in the Yampa Basin caused a short-term rise in discharge during the overall <br />descend of the flood. The discharge increased 85 m3fs over a 6-dy period, and then the descending limb resumed its <br />systematic decrease. During this period, the upstream end of the bank-attached bar eroded 0.5 m (Appendix C). The <br />middle and downstream end of the bank-attached bar remained at about the same elevation. but a large dune was <br />