Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Fmal Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />results ofYu and Wolman (1987) are consistent with Lyons and others (1992) finding that channel widening and <br /> <br />narrowing have both occurred since closure of Flaming Gorge Dam, but the net trend has been narrowing due to lower <br /> <br />average flows. <br /> <br />Numerical Modeling of Flow and Sediment <br />Transport in Natural Channels <br /> <br />For this study, it is desirable to predict bar and bed response to high flows and bed evolution during passage of <br /> <br />a flood in order to design flood flows that will improve and enhance habitats. <br /> <br />The 3-dimensional flow of water in rivers is very complex. Empirical models of river flow reduce this complex <br /> <br />system to a simpler 1- or 2-dimension system with empirically-derived factors. An often employed example of this type <br /> <br />ofmodel is theHEC-2 model developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (HEC, 1982). The HEC-2 model is used <br /> <br />to calculate water surface profiles for ~ver reaches using cross-sectional data and Manning's n. a channel roughness <br /> <br />coefficient This model assumes steady, uniform flow and predicts water surface elevations. However, being a 2- <br /> <br />dimensional model, it has no information concerning lateral distribution of hydraulic properties. More recent modeling <br /> <br />efforts recognize that 3-dimensional properties such as topographically-induced convective accelerations, secondary <br /> <br />circulation, and the distribution of boundary shear stress within the curvilinear 3-dimensional channel are critical to <br /> <br />determining patterns of erosion and deposition (for example, Nelson and Smith, 1989a; Smith and McLean, 1984; <br /> <br />Engelund, 1974). <br /> <br />An orthogonal stream-wise coordinate system appropriate for stream models was developed by Smith and <br /> <br />McLean (1984). The N avier-Stokes equations, the equations of motion which consider local and convective <br /> <br />accelerations in fluids, were then transformed to the stream-wise system. Smith and McLean (1984) compared modeled <br /> <br />results for bottom shear stress and free surface elevation with those measured in Hooke's (1975) flume experiments ina <br /> <br />fixed-bed sinusoidal channel. Their model produced the same pattern of boundary shear stress, although the maximum <br /> <br />boundary shear stress was underestimated, and the area of low boundary shear stress extended too far downstream. <br /> <br />Nelson and Smith (1989a) refined and expanded the model of Smith and McLean (1975). Therevisedmodel <br /> <br />allowed variation in channel width, accounted for the presence of bedforms, and predicted sediment transport. <br /> <br />Numerical results for boundary shear stress, sediment transport, and vertically-averaged velocity compared well with the <br /> <br />field measurements by Dietrich (1982) in Muddy Creek. Nelson and Smith (I 989b) expanded this model using <br />