Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Fmal Completion Report [0 UDWR for Contract #93-1070. Amendment 3 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />Borland, 1951), so that most sediment is transported by suspension. While bed scour in sand-bedded rivers occurs <br /> <br />during floods by the suspension of sediment, the sediment in motion moves at a much slower rate than the water flow. <br /> <br />Increased sediment concentrations reduce water velocities further decreasing the rate of transport. Thus, while large <br /> <br />volumes of sediment may be in transport, the net change in sediment storage within a reach may be small (Leopold and <br /> <br />others, 1964). It should also be noted that, even for rivers transporting large quantities of sediment, the amount of <br /> <br />sediment transported is small compared to the amount of sediment stored on the bed. banks, and in the floodplain. <br /> <br />Discharge measurement records from the discontinued USGS gaging station near Ouray (station number <br /> <br />09307000) were re-analyzed by Schmidt (1994). His analysis for the gage cross section showed an annual scour and fill <br /> <br />c)Cle of about 3 m during the passage of the spring flood (Fig. 9). Scour occurred on the ascending limb of the <br /> <br />hydrograph, and filling occurred during the descending limb and subsequent low flows. As described below, this <br /> <br /> <br />pattern of scour and fill was similar to. the pattern that was observed at some cross sections within the detailed study <br /> <br /> <br />reach, both in terms of depth of scour and timing of scour and fill. <br /> <br />Long-tenn Channel Response <br /> <br /> <br />The response of rivers to disturbance is of concern to geomorphologists, ecologists, and engineers. A <br /> <br /> <br />"disturbance" to a river may be either natural, such as the passage of a very large flood, or human induced, such as the <br /> <br />closure of a dam. Regime theory considers a river to be an equilibrium expression of the long-term average of the <br /> <br /> <br />hydrology of a basin (Y u and Wolman. 1987), but on a year-to-year scale, natural rivers are highly variable. <br /> <br />Yu and Wolman (1987) developed a model for the dynamic adjustment of alluvial river width, They modeled <br /> <br /> <br />channel width as a function of present discharge and past high flow events; the most recent events were given greater <br /> <br />weight in the model, and the geomorhpic importance of past events decreased with time. Y u and Wolman's (1987) <br /> <br /> <br />simulation model predicted that average channel width increased with high flow events, and then progressively <br /> <br /> <br />decreased (i.e., "recovered"), until a flow event of great magnitude occurred. This model shows that the expected <br /> <br />channel form of natural rivers varies over time, and is not static; increases in channel width occur only when certain <br /> <br />threshold discharges are exceeded. In addition. channel narrowing continues until the peak discharges are sufficient to <br /> <br />mllintllin or increase channel width. <br /> <br />Prior to dam closure, the higher magnitude, but highly variable, flood peaks of the Green River formed a <br />channel that was wider than that the current river (Andrews, 1986; Lyons and others. 1992). The simulation model <br />