My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8128
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8128
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Operation of Glen Canyon Dam\
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Description of Alternatives <br />Beach/Habitat-Building Flows <br />Sandbars above the normal peak river stage would continue to erode, and <br />backwater habitat within normal stage would tend to fill with sediment <br />under any EIS alternative. To alleviate this, beach/habitat-building flows <br />have been incorporated in all restricted fluctuating and steady flow <br />alternatives. <br />Beach/habitat-building flows would be scheduled high releases of short <br />duration designed to rebuild high elevation sandbars, deposit nutrients, <br />restore backwater channels, and provide some of the dynamics of a natural <br />system. A frequency of 1 in 5 years (when the reservoir is low) was <br />assumed for analyzing the environmental consequences. These flows <br />would be avoided during high reservoir conditions because of the <br />increased risk of unscheduled flows greater than powerplant capacity. <br />Magnitudes would be at least 10,000 cfs greater than the allowable peak <br />discharge in a minimum release year for a given alternative. Releases <br />would be increased at no more than 4,000 cfs/hour and decreased at a <br />maximum of 1,500 cfs/hour. As part of adaptive management, a test of a <br />beach/habitat-building flow would be conducted prior to long-term <br />implementation of this element to test the predictions made about its <br />impacts. Scheduled flows exceeding powerplant capacity (33,200 cfs) may <br />require legislation to implement. <br />Beach/habitat-building flows could be scheduled in the spring (to coincide <br />with the May/June peak in the natural hydrologic cycle) or in late summer <br />when, due to local thunderstorms, tributaries are expected to supply large <br />quantities of sediment and nutrients. Initially, these flows would be <br />scheduled for a duration of 1 to 2 weeks. Additional water would be <br />scheduled in the spring to support this flow. <br />Beach/habitat-building flows would be recommended under the Adaptive <br />Management Program and scheduled as part of the Annual Operating <br />Plan. Such flows would be recommended during years when sufficient <br />quantities of sediment are available, but not following a year in which a <br />large population of young humpback chub is produced. <br />New Population of Humpback Chub <br />The Grand Canyon population of humpback chub (an endangered species) <br />uses habitats in both the Colorado River mainstem and the Little Colorado <br />River (LCR). Conditions in the mainstem (principally water temperatures) <br />are not conducive to humpback chub spawning or survival of eggs and <br />young. The only confirmed successful spawning habitat for that <br />population is in the LCR, with individuals moving between that tributary <br />and the mainstem. <br />14 Glen Canyon Dam EIS Summary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.