Laserfiche WebLink
Description of Alternatives <br />Beach/Habitat-Building Flows <br />Sandbars above the normal peak river stage would continue to erode, and <br />backwater habitat within normal stage would tend to fill with sediment <br />under any EIS alternative. To alleviate this, beach/habitat-building flows <br />have been incorporated in all restricted fluctuating and steady flow <br />alternatives. <br />Beach/habitat-building flows would be scheduled high releases of short <br />duration designed to rebuild high elevation sandbars, deposit nutrients, <br />restore backwater channels, and provide some of the dynamics of a natural <br />system. A frequency of 1 in 5 years (when the reservoir is low) was <br />assumed for analyzing the environmental consequences. These flows <br />would be avoided during high reservoir conditions because of the <br />increased risk of unscheduled flows greater than powerplant capacity. <br />Magnitudes would be at least 10,000 cfs greater than the allowable peak <br />discharge in a minimum release year for a given alternative. Releases <br />would be increased at no more than 4,000 cfs/hour and decreased at a <br />maximum of 1,500 cfs/hour. As part of adaptive management, a test of a <br />beach/habitat-building flow would be conducted prior to long-term <br />implementation of this element to test the predictions made about its <br />impacts. Scheduled flows exceeding powerplant capacity (33,200 cfs) may <br />require legislation to implement. <br />Beach/habitat-building flows could be scheduled in the spring (to coincide <br />with the May/June peak in the natural hydrologic cycle) or in late summer <br />when, due to local thunderstorms, tributaries are expected to supply large <br />quantities of sediment and nutrients. Initially, these flows would be <br />scheduled for a duration of 1 to 2 weeks. Additional water would be <br />scheduled in the spring to support this flow. <br />Beach/habitat-building flows would be recommended under the Adaptive <br />Management Program and scheduled as part of the Annual Operating <br />Plan. Such flows would be recommended during years when sufficient <br />quantities of sediment are available, but not following a year in which a <br />large population of young humpback chub is produced. <br />New Population of Humpback Chub <br />The Grand Canyon population of humpback chub (an endangered species) <br />uses habitats in both the Colorado River mainstem and the Little Colorado <br />River (LCR). Conditions in the mainstem (principally water temperatures) <br />are not conducive to humpback chub spawning or survival of eggs and <br />young. The only confirmed successful spawning habitat for that <br />population is in the LCR, with individuals moving between that tributary <br />and the mainstem. <br />14 Glen Canyon Dam EIS Summary