Laserfiche WebLink
Description of Alternatives <br />The eight action alternatives were designed to provide a broad spectrum of <br />options. One alternative would allow unrestricted fluctuations in flow <br />(within the physical constraints of the powerplant) to maximize power <br />production, four would impose varying restrictions on fluctuations, and <br />three others would provide steady flows on a monthly, seasonal, or annual <br />basis. The names of the alternatives reflect the operational regimes they <br />represent. In addition, the restricted fluctuating flow and steady flow <br />alternatives include common elements, which are discussed in the next <br />section. The EIS team and the cooperating agencies attempted to balance <br />benefits to all resources (physical, biological, cultural, and consumable) in <br />identifying the preferred alternative-the Modified Low Fluctuating Flow <br />Alternative. <br />COMMON ELEMENTS <br />The elements common to all restricted fluctuating flow and steady flow <br />alternatives were designed to provide additional resource protection or <br />enhancement. Impact analyses took these common elements into account. <br />Adaptive Management <br />Many uncertainties still exist regarding downstream impacts of water <br />releases from Glen Canyon Dam. The concept of adaptive management <br />is based on the recognized need for ongoing operational flexibility to <br />respond to future monitoring and research findings and varying resource <br />conditions. <br />The purpose of the Adaptive Management Program would be to develop <br />modifications to dam operations and exercise other authorities under <br />existing law as provided in the Grand Canyon Protection Act to protect, <br />mitigate adverse impacts to, and improve the values for which the Glen <br />of the <br />Designee <br />Adaptive Management <br />Work Group A <br />Z -7? `111? <br />Technical Monitoring and Independent <br />Work Group '-'? aeseerch center ?"'-? Review Panel <br />Canyon National Recreation Area <br />and Grand Canyon National Park <br />were established. Long-term <br />monitoring and research are essential <br />to adaptive management and would <br />measure how well the selected <br />alternative meets resource <br />management objectives. <br />Consultation would be maintained <br />with appropriate agencies of the <br />Department of the Interior, including <br />the FWS, NPS, Reclamation, and BIA; <br />the Secretary of Energy; Governors of <br />Arizona, California, Colorado, <br />Glen Canyon Dam EIS Summary 9