My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9631
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9631
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9631
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Draft Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S.11 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES <br />Under the No Action Alternative, Flaming Gorge Dam would be operated to achieve the <br />flow and temperature regimes recommended by the 1992 Biological Opinion on the <br />Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. Depending upon the hydrologic conditions of the <br />upper Green River Basin, forecasted flows on the Yampa River would be supplemented <br />by releases from Flaming Gorge Dam designed to achieve the peak flow, duration, and <br />base flow (riverflows not associated with snowmelt runoff) recommendations described <br />in the 1992 Biological Opinion. <br />Under the Action Alternative, Flaming Gorge Dam would be operated to achieve the flow <br />and temperature regimes recommended in the 2000 Flow and Temperature <br />Recommendations. <br />SAM Development of Alternatives <br />S.11.1.1 Criteria Used to Select Alternatives <br />Potential alternatives analyzed in the DEIS were studied to determine whether they could <br />meet the purpose of and need for the Proposed Action. A number of scenarios for dam <br />operation, originally thought to be viable alternatives, were determined to be more <br />accurately described as possible subsets of the Action Alternative. Because of the <br />inherent need for operational flexibility in dam operations, as acknowledged by and <br />incorporated into the 2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations, and because any <br />potential impacts from discreet operational scenarios are already captured by analysis of <br />the Action and No Action Alternatives, it was determined that analyzing subtle <br />differences in dam operations as separate alternatives would not yield meaningful <br />information for the public or the decisionmaker. <br />Alternatives that are included in this analysis are those which both: <br />? Meet flow and temperature recommendations as described in the 2000 Flow and <br />Temperature Recommendations. <br />? Maintain all authorized purposes of the Flaming Gorge Unit of CRSP. <br />S.11.1.2 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated From Detailed Study <br />S.11.1.2.1 Modified Run of the River Alternative - During the scoping process, the <br />National Park Service and others requested consideration of a Run of the River <br />Alternative. Under such an alternative, dam releases would match the reservoir inflow <br />(unregulated) to provide a more natural flow regime including more natural variations in <br />the daily flows of the Green River below Flaming Gorge Dam. Further analysis of this <br />alternative led to the establishment of a Modified Run of River Alternative, where dam <br />releases equaled 87 percent (%) of the unregulated inflow to the reservoir. This provided <br />reservoir operators the ability to store 13% of the spring inflow volume for release to <br />meet project purposes and flow recommendations at other times of the year. The <br />87% level was chosen because it was the highest percentage that provided enough water <br />S-14 -.% Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Draft EIS
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.