My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7750
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:26:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7750
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Study of Alternative Water Supplies for Endangered Fishes in the "15-Mile Reach" of the Colorado River.
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER IV UTILIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL WATER RIGHTS I <br />The two important measures of injury are a change in the depletion of the stream and a <br />change in the timing of the flows. The depletion is usually measured in terms of historic <br />CU. Initially, this may not appear to be an issue for the Recovery Program since an <br />instream flow does not "consume" any water. But moving a larger volume of water than the <br />historic CU of a water right could have injurious affects on water users between the historic <br />location and the Reach. For example, if the Recovery Program purchased a 30 cfs direct <br />flow right in the Glenwood Springs area that had historically irrigated 1,000 acres and <br />consumed 2,000 AF of water. Over a 200-day growing season, this acreage consumed water <br />at the rate of 5 cfs. Of the remaining 25 cfs, a small portion evaporated, some may have <br />entered a non-tributary ground water system, but the majority of the water eventually <br />returned to the river. The portion that returned to the river was available to the irrigators <br />downstream. To prevent injury, the only portion of the water right which could be <br />transferred to the Reach was the portion that was consumed. <br />Generally, CU per irrigated acre decreases as the elevation of the irrigated field increases. <br />The CU for alfalfa in the Grand Valley is about 40 inches/year/acre. Subtracting the usable <br />precipitation, the net CU is 36 inches/year. From the Grand Valley, proceeding upstream, <br />the net use for alfalfa at, Rifle is 31 inches, New Castle 24 inches, Glenwood Springs 23 <br />inches, and Eagle is 17 inches.' <br />To focus the Recovery Program on those areas which have the highest potential of providing <br />CU, an arbitrary decision was made to restrict the search to those areas which had a net CU <br />of about 50 percent of that found in the Grand Valley. Eagle, Colorado, is in the Soil <br />Conservation Service's climatic zone 5.2 The climatic zone is an indication of CU, as the <br />climatic zone number increases the CU decreases. Grand Junction is in climatic zone 1. <br />Only those water rights within the climatic zones 1 through 5 were selected. <br />The timing of the CU occurs earlier in the year as elevation increases. The peak <br />consumption rate for water rights in climatic zone 5 is in July and decreases by 60 to 70 <br />percent by September. Consequently, the ability to transfer water from zone 5 areas will be <br />further limited by timing of use. <br />These rights can be divided into three categories: those upstream and junior to the Cameo <br />call, upstream and senior to Cameo, and the rights at Cameo. Roughly 2,260 cfs of water at <br />the Cameo gage is required to meet all of the irrigation and power demands in the valley <br />(1,620 at the Cameo diversion and 640 for GVIC). With the current operation of the <br />' U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. Colorado Irrigation Guide, 1978 and 1988. <br />2 Ibid. I <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.