My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9579
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:25:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9579
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Summary of the Final Environmental Impact Statement - Navajo Reservoir Operations.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction - Durango, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />FEIS - Navajo Reservoir Operations <br />EIS Evaluation Process <br />The EIS evaluated seven alternatives. Most of the alternatives formulated for evaluation <br />are described in terms of flow rates representing minimum and maximum limits in the <br />range of release rates (cfs) for Navajo Dam. For example, the 250/5000 Alternative has <br />a minimum release of 250 cfs and a maximum release of 5,000 cfs. The alternatives <br />formulated are shown in table S-1, and the alternatives formulation/ evaluation process <br />is depicted in figure S-3. <br />Table S-1.-List of Navajo Reservoir operations <br />EIS alternatives <br />Title <br />No Action Alternative (Historical Operation) (1973 - 91) <br />250/5000 Alternative <br />500/5000 Alternative <br />250 Variable/5000 Alternative <br />250/6000 Alternative <br />500/6000 Alternative <br />Decommission/Breach Navajo Dam Alternative <br />The range of alternatives developed was formulated and subsequently evaluated using <br />hydrologic modeling and each alternative's ability to: <br />? Maintain authorized purposes of the Navajo Unit <br />? Meet the goals of the SJRBRIP <br />? Meet the Flow Recommendations for the San Juan River (Flow Recommendations) <br />(Holden, 1999) <br />? Reflect public scoping meetings and informal public contacts <br />? Reflect coordination with cooperating agencies and interagency consultations
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.