Laserfiche WebLink
<br />d'b <br /> <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />December 1, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />5. Walleye were identified as a threat to all endangered . <br />fish by the experts surveyed by Hawkins and Nesler (1991). ..--Th~se <br />experts noted that razorback sucker young and Colorado squawfish <br />were especially vulnerable to walleye predation, and that walleye <br />posed a threat of competition in particular to Colorado <br />squawfish. <br /> <br />The potential for conflict with endangered species from <br />stocking these nonnatives in the sites the Division proposes is <br />great. Aside from Harvey Gap, Elkhead, and Highline reservoirs, <br />all sites proposed for stocking are ponds that lie within the <br />floodplain of the Colorado River. The Division is incapable of <br />preventing nonnative escape from these ponds when the river <br />reaches flood stage sufficient for communication with these <br />ponds. Thus, stocking in ponds susceptible to flooding creates <br />the potential for interaction with endangered species. The harm <br />to endangered species which will result from such interaction is <br />prohibited by the Endangered Species Act, conflicts with the <br />Divisionis duties under the Colorado Nongame, Endangered, or <br />Threatened Species Conservation Act, and is inconsistent with <br />Coloradols position as signatory to the Recovery Program. <br /> <br />In addition, all ponds located within the 100 year <br />floodplain are designated critical habitat for the endangered <br />Colorado river fish. Stocking in these locations constitutes an <br />adverse modification of critical habitat. The Endangered Species <br />Act prOhibits such adverse modifications. <br /> <br />Elkhead reservoir and Highline reservoir, while not in <br />the Colorado River floodplain, have their own problems: <br /> <br />1. Elkhead Reservoir: The Division admits that fish <br />stocked in Elkhead reservoir are not secure by noting that <br />"escapement potential is high. II But the Division proposes no <br />measures to reduce nonnative escape. A recent article in The <br />Denver Post (attached) details the consequences of past stocking <br />in Elkhead, which include predation on endangered fish and a <br />costly and laborious effort to remove northern pike from the <br />Yampa system. The escape route from Elkhead leads directly to <br />critical habitat in the Yampa River. The Divisionis assertion <br />that only adult Colorado squawfish are found in the Yampa River <br />is false. Humpback chub have been collected in the ~rQ~l? ._'__n <br />Mountain Canyon area~' --lilhthe Little Snake River, and in the. lower <br />Yampa-Green system, which r~mains the last stronghold for all <br />four endangered Colorado River fishes (USFWS, 1993). Bass <br />escaping from Elkhead have~n~mpeded access to these habitats. <br /> <br />2. Highline Reservoir: The Divisionis assertion that <br />stocking channel catfish and walleye in Highline reservoir will <br />not impact endangered fish is pure speculation. The Division <br />