My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7893
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7893
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:22:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7893
Author
Satterfield, J. R., Jr.
Title
Summary Of Responses, Colorado Division Of Wildlife Lake Management Plans.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(-). I, <br /> <br />Colorado Division of wildlife <br />December 1, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Potential for conflict with endangered species is high <br />in all but one of these stocking proposals. with the exception <br />of Harvey Gap reservoir, the Division does not and cannot <br />demonstrate that stocked fish will not escape into endangered <br />fish habitat. Thus, the Division's proposals hold potential for <br />conflict between endangered fish and the warmwater species it <br />wants to stock here. <br /> <br />If stocked nonnatives come into contact with endangered <br />fish or their habitat, the nonnatives will almost certainly harm <br />the endangered species. Colorado River n~tive fish evolved in a <br />largely predator-free system, ~ith Colorado squawfish the only <br />high-order predator. The comparatively recent introduction of <br />nonnative fishes is universally recognized as one of the key <br />causes of the decline of the native Colorado River fish fauna. <br />The native fish fauna is, quite simply, unable to compete with <br />the exotic species the Division proposes to introduce to the <br />system. <br /> <br />The five fish species the Division proposes to stock in <br />the northwest region pose a well-known threat to endangered <br />Colorado River fish. We briefly detail here documentation of <br />such problems by species: <br /> <br />1. Largemouth bass are repeat offenders when it comes to <br />predation on Colorado River endangered fish. Langhorst (1989), <br />Hendrickson and Brooks (1987), and Osmundson (1987) all report <br />largemouth bass predation on both razorback sucker and Colorado <br />squawfish. In fact, Osmundson (1987) reported that largemouth <br />bass actually prefer young Colorado squawfish to other species, <br />including red shiner and fathead minnow, when given a choice of <br />prey. <br /> <br />2. Blaok orappie predation on young Colorado squawfish in <br />floodplain grow-out ponds along the Colorado River was noted by <br />Osmundson (1989). <br /> <br />3. Channel oatfish were ranked as the number one problem <br />species with regard to impacts on native Colorado River basin <br />fish in a survey of expert government biologists by Hawkins and <br />Nesler (1991). Documentation of channel catfish predation on <br />endangered species iswidespread..___Channel catfish also pose a <br />threat to adult Colorado squawfish, as the dorsal spine can cause <br />catfish to lodge in the throat of and choke adult squawfish <br />(Pimental, et. al., 1985) ~ ' <br /> <br />. <br />4. Bluagill were identified as competitors with endangered <br />species by expert government biologists surveyed by Hawkins and <br />Nesler (1991). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.