Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Background <br />Tiger muskie have been evaluated as a candidate for introduction into select western <br />Colorado waters because they have specific attributes which may help address sportfish <br />management interests without compromising the protection of other aquatic wildlife resources. <br />Some of these attributes include sterility, trophy potential, and the ability of tiger muskie to <br />control populations of other introduced species such as common carp and white suckers in closed <br />systems. <br />One of the major attractions of tiger muskie as a management tool, particularly in waters <br />where escapement may occur, is the fishes' inability to reproduce (Hesser 1978). Recently, the <br />assumption of tiger muskie sterility has been questioned, and the CD OW completed an extensive <br />literature review and survey to identify any recent evidence of tiger muskie reproduction <br />(Appendix C). Satterfield (1993) was unable to find any documentation of tiger muskie <br />reproduction in the wild, in the literature, or through correspondence with fisheries professionals <br />in ten states. Satterfield concluded that a preponderance of information in the literature and <br />management experience across the United States suggests tiger muskie are incapable of <br />reproduction under natural conditions. <br />Tiger muskies are attractive to anglers because they reach a relatively large size, thus <br />providing a unique trophy fishery. Tiger muskie were introduced into select eastern Colorado <br />waters in 1984. Since then, 39 waters in Colorado have been stocked with tiger muskie. <br />Presently, the CDOW annually stocks approximately 38,000 fish in 22 waters throughout central <br /> <br />."... <br />and eastern Colorado. A statewide 30 inch minimum size limit has been applied to tiger <br />muskies, and in good waters tiger muskie reach this size in approximately 4-6 years. Several <br />waters including Cherry Creek Reservoir, Barr Lake, and Lon Hagler Reservoir routinely <br />produce legal-size fish. The current state record, a 32 lb. 15 oz. fish was caught in Quincy <br />Reservoir in 1993. <br />Tiger muskie are also a useful sportfish because they can often be used to reduce <br />densities and improve structure and dynamics. of associated populations of prey and panfish. <br />Tiger muskie can also provide population control of species such as common carp and white <br />suckers which often dominate reservoir fisheries to the detriment of sportfish management. <br />Table 1 includes data demonstrating how tiger muskie have reduced abundance of common carp <br />and white sucker populations in several CDOW Central Region waters (Appendix D). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />