My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7899
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7899
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:22:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7899
Author
Satterfield, J. R., Jr., W. R. Elmblad and D. Langlois.
Title
State of Colorado, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Report to Colorado Wildlife Commission, Draft Stocking Analysis For Tiger Muskie In Select Western Colorado Waters.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Relationship to CDOW Mission <br />The mission of the CDOW is to perpetuate the wildlife resources of the State and provide <br />people the opportunity to enjoy them. Thus, the two primary roles of the CDOW include: (1) <br />protecting Colorado's wildlife resources by assuring viable populations of all species; and (2) <br />providing opportunities for consumptive and non-consumptive wildlife-related recreation. The <br />challenge facing the CDOW is to simultaneously implement both facets of its mission. <br />One approach to accomplishing the overall CDOW mission is to develop and utilize a <br />variety of species and habitat management approaches including ecosystem management to insure <br />the viability of all wildlife species is considered when decisions are made. Therefore, an <br />objective of this stocking analysis is to report the impacts, risks, and uncertainties of introducing <br />tiger muskie into select western Colorado waters. The question of whether to manage tiger <br />muskie in western Colorado is best examined in terms of the balance that must exist between <br />protecting wildlife and providing sportfishing opportunities. Ultimately, the question becomes: <br />Is there a reasonable way to provide new angling opportunities and also protect the existing <br />aquatic wildlife resource? <br />This is a key question because while there is an increasing interest for non-consumptive <br />and native wildlife management, sportfishing opportunities are also in great demand. Surveys <br />show that in 1991 an estimated 10,000 to 13,000 anglers fished approximately 66,000 days for <br />warmwater fish species in western Colorado. Furthermore, during recent public meetings <br />conducted in western Colorado, a great deal of interest has been expressed in expanding <br />warmwater fish management efforts in this part of the State. Two of these include Recovery <br />Implementation Program public meetings conducted in Grand Junction (7/1/93) and Craig <br />(8/25/93). <br />In addition to providing for angling diversity, warmwater fish are in demand in western <br />Colorado because some waters in this part of the State are too warm to provide opportunities for <br />salmonid management. Furthermore, some cold water reservoirs have the capability of <br />supporting a diversity of cold- and warmwater fishes. Thus, from a sportfishing perspective, <br />there is a need and a niche for introduced warm water species to provide angling opportunities <br />in western Colorado. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.